Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Synteny and Evolution02:31

Synteny and Evolution

3.4K
John H. Renwick first coined the term “synteny” in 1971, which refers to the genes present on the same chromosomes, even if they are not genetically linked. The species with common ancestry tend to show conserved syntenic regions. Therefore, the concept of synteny is nowadays used to describe the evolutionary relationship between species.
Around 80 million years ago, the human and mice lineages diverged from the common ancestor. During the course of evolution, the ancestral...
3.4K
Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior01:28

Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior

56
Automatic processing refers to the cognitive operations that occur without conscious intent or awareness, playing a fundamental role in shaping social cognition and behavior. These processes enable individuals to navigate complex social environments efficiently by relying on mental shortcuts and pre-existing knowledge structures known as schemas. One of the most influential mechanisms underlying automatic processing is priming, which subtly activates mental representations through exposure to...
56
Gene Duplication and Divergence02:37

Gene Duplication and Divergence

7.3K
The seminal work of Ohno in 1970 popularized the idea of gene duplication and divergence. DNA sequence comparison studies reveal that a large portion of the genes in bacteria, archaebacteria, and eukaryotes was  generated by gene duplication and divergence, indicating its critical role in evolution.
The duplicated copies of the gene are called Paralogs. Paralogs with similar sequences and functions form a gene family. Across several species, a large number of gene families are...
7.3K
Phylogenetic Trees03:21

Phylogenetic Trees

48.3K
Phylogenetic trees come in many forms. It matters in which sequence the organisms are arranged from the bottom to the top of the tree, but the branches can rotate at their nodes without altering the information. The lines connecting individual nodes can be straight, angled, or even curved.
48.3K
Convergent Evolution01:54

Convergent Evolution

29.8K
Evolution shapes the features of organisms over time, ensuring that they are suited for the environments in which they live. Sometimes, selection pressure leads to the rise of similar but unrelated adaptations in organisms with no recent common ancestors, a process known as convergent evolution.
29.8K
Nonconscious Mimicry01:13

Nonconscious Mimicry

4.7K
Nonconscious mimicry occurs when individuals alter their mannerisms to match the behaviors and expressions of those nearby, without intention.
4.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

You can't be neutral on a moving train.

The Behavioral and brain sciencesยท2026
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 27, 2025

Assessment of Social Cognition in Non-human Primates Using a Network of Computerized Automated Learning Device ALDM Test Systems
08:42

Assessment of Social Cognition in Non-human Primates Using a Network of Computerized Automated Learning Device ALDM Test Systems

Published on: May 5, 2015

12.3K

Comment on "Nonadjacent dependency processing in monkeys, apes, and humans".

Jonathan Rawski1,2, William Idsardi3,4, Jeffrey Heinz5,2

  • 1Linguistics Department, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA. jonathan.rawski@stonybrook.edu.

Science Advances
|July 22, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study questions whether nonhuman animals can learn syntactic dependencies. The authors argue that observed behaviors may instead reflect phonological dependency learning, a simpler linguistic mechanism.

More Related Videos

Dissecting the Non-human Primate Brain in Stereotaxic Space
09:09

Dissecting the Non-human Primate Brain in Stereotaxic Space

Published on: July 16, 2009

10.3K
Behavioral Assessment of Manual Dexterity in Non-Human Primates
16:00

Behavioral Assessment of Manual Dexterity in Non-Human Primates

Published on: November 11, 2011

22.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 27, 2025

Assessment of Social Cognition in Non-human Primates Using a Network of Computerized Automated Learning Device ALDM Test Systems
08:42

Assessment of Social Cognition in Non-human Primates Using a Network of Computerized Automated Learning Device ALDM Test Systems

Published on: May 5, 2015

12.3K
Dissecting the Non-human Primate Brain in Stereotaxic Space
09:09

Dissecting the Non-human Primate Brain in Stereotaxic Space

Published on: July 16, 2009

10.3K
Behavioral Assessment of Manual Dexterity in Non-Human Primates
16:00

Behavioral Assessment of Manual Dexterity in Non-Human Primates

Published on: November 11, 2011

22.6K

Area of Science:

  • Linguistics
  • Animal Cognition
  • Animal Behavior

Background:

  • The study by Watson et al. proposed that nonhuman animals can learn syntactic dependencies.
  • This claim is based on behavioral evidence from their experiments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the technical interpretation of Watson et al.'s study.
  • To challenge the conclusion that their findings demonstrate syntactic dependency learning in nonhuman animals.

Main Methods:

  • Re-analysis of the behavioral evidence presented by Watson et al.
  • Comparison of alternative learning models (syntactic vs. phonological dependencies).

Main Results:

  • The behavioral data from Watson et al.'s experiments are also consistent with phonological dependency learning.
  • The evidence does not exclusively support the claim of syntactic learning.

Conclusions:

  • The conclusion that nonhuman animals can learn syntactic dependencies is not definitively supported by the evidence presented.
  • Alternative explanations, such as phonological learning, provide a more parsimonious account of the findings.