Secondary Interpretations of Diagnostic Imaging Examinations: Patient Liabilities and Out-of-Pocket Costs

Secondary interpretations of diagnostic imaging examinations are increasingly performed to improve care for complex patients. We sought to determine associated patient-billed liabilities and out-of-pocket payments and to identify patient and imaging study characteristics that correlate with higher patient bills and out-of-pocket payments.

Data extracted for 7,740 secondary imaging interpretations performed across our large metropolitan health system over 25 months included total professional charges, insurance payments, patient-billed liabilities, and patient out-of-pocket payments. Multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to identify patient and imaging factors associated with higher patient bills and out-of-pocket payments.

Mean secondary interpretation professional charges, insurance payments, patient-billed liabilities, and patient out-of-pocket payments were $306.50, $108.02, $27.80, and $14.55, respectively. Patients received bills for 47.5% of services and made out-of-pocket payments for 17.1%. Patient-billed liabilities and out-of-pocket payments were higher for patients who were younger and uninsured and for secondary interpretations requested for patients seen in outpatient (versus inpatient) settings. Patient-billed liabilities and out-of-pocket payments were lower for patients who were Black (versus White) and had government-sponsored (versus commercial) insurance and for secondary interpretations performed during the second, third, or fourth (versus first) quarter of each calendar year.

Observed differences between patient-billed liabilities and out-of-pocket payments suggest that secondary interpretations of diagnostic imaging examinations can result in small but real patient financial burdens. Improved price transparency and enhanced patient communication about the value of secondary interpretations could reduce potential surprises when patients receive these bills.