Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 27, 2025

Pavlovian Conditioned Approach Training in Rats
Published on: February 4, 2016
Relationship between reinforcement rate and response rate in Pavlovian and operant conditioning with compound stimuli
Andeson Gonçalves Carneiro1, Guilherme Paes1, Miriam Garcia-Mijares1
1Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Instituto de Psicologia Avenida Professor Mello Moraes, 1721, 05508-030, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Harris, Andrew, and Livesey (2012) proposed that response rate (R) to a stimulus (e.g., A) of a compound (e.g., AB) would be directly related to the difference between reinforcement rate (r) during AB and the other stimulus (e.g., B). To explore the extent of this proposal to operant conditioning, three experiments were carried out. Experiment 1 replicated Harris et al. (2012 - Experiment 1) using sucrose as US in Pavlovian conditioning. In Experiment 2 rats pressed a lever under a variable interval schedule in two phases. In Training, responses during a compound stimulus AB100% were reinforced 100%, responses during B50% and C50% 50% and responses during D25%, 25% of the trials. Then, nonreinforced A trials were introduced (Probe). Results from Experiment 2 showed that r controlled the R to AB100%, B50%, C50% and D25% during training and probe, however, were inconclusive about r and R relationship during A. In Experiment 3, responses during A100% were reinforced 100% and during B50% and C50% 50% of the trials (Training). Next, nonreinforced BC trials were presented (Probe). Results from Experiment 3 showed that response rate during BC were similar to A100%, but higher than B50% and C50%, suggesting summation of B50% and C50% reinforcement rates. Overall, the results showed that Harris et al. (2012) proposal extends to discriminative operant relations.
Harris, Andrew, and Livesey (2012) proposed that response rate (R) to a stimulus (e.g., A) of a compound (e.g., AB) would be directly related to the difference between reinforcement rate (r) during AB and the other stimulus (e.g., B). To explore the extent of this proposal to operant conditioning, three experiments were carried out. Experiment 1 replicated Harris et al. (2012 - Experiment 1) using sucrose as US in Pavlovian conditioning. In Experiment 2 rats pressed a lever under a variable interval schedule in two phases. In Training, responses during a compound stimulus AB100% were reinforced 100%, responses during B50% and C50% 50% and responses during D25%, 25% of the trials. Then, nonreinforced A trials were introduced (Probe). Results from Experiment 2 showed that r controlled the R to AB100%, B50%, C50% and D25% during training and probe, however, were inconclusive about r and R relationship during A. In Experiment 3, responses during A100% were reinforced 100% and during B50% and C50% 50% of the trials (Training). Next, nonreinforced BC trials were presented (Probe). Results from Experiment 3 showed that response rate during BC were similar to A100%, but higher than B50% and C50%, suggesting summation of B50% and C50% reinforcement rates. Overall, the results showed that Harris et al. (2012) proposal extends to discriminative operant relations.
Related Concept Videos
Reinforcement Schedules
Once a behavior is learned,...
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
Operant Conditioning
Reinforcement in operant conditioning can be positive or negative, both of which serve to increase the likelihood of a behavior. Positive...
Principles of Classical Conditioning
During the...
Associative Learning
Classical conditioning, also known...
Classical Conditioning
Ivan Pavlov observed that dogs...

