Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

8.3K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
8.3K
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

42
Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
42
Group Design02:01

Group Design

9.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
9.9K
Study Design in Statistics01:15

Study Design in Statistics

9.6K
A study design is a set of techniques that allow a researcher to collect and analyze data from different variables defined for a specific research problem. Statistics is commonly for effective study design and more robust experiments,
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
9.6K
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

38
Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to...
38
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

6.6K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

IgG4-related Coronary Periarteritis, Pseudoaneurysm, and Myocardial Ischemia.

Radiology·2026
Same author

Development and Application of Nano-Micro Sealant for Water-Based Drilling Fluids in Deep Shale Gas Formations of the Sichuan-Chongqing Region.

Gels (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Enzyme-assisted catalytic hairpin assembly based aggregation-induced emission assay for trace miRNA-196a in serum.

The Analyst·2026
Same author

Two-stage robust 3D CTA-2D DSA alignment via vascular-aware rigid and pyramid-based hierarchical non-rigid registration.

Medical image analysis·2026
Same author

A deep learning system for non-invasive breast cancer diagnosis with multimodal data.

Nature biomedical engineering·2026
Same author

Coronary stenosis assessment: AI-based CT quantification, visual analysis of invasive angiography, and quantitative coronary angiography.

Insights into imaging·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 27, 2025

Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform
07:57

Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform

Published on: March 24, 2022

2.9K

Design and rationale of randomized CT-PRECISION study.

Xu Dai1, Yarong Yu2, Lihua Yu1

  • 1Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.

Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy
|July 23, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study compares coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) with dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging (CT-MPI) versus CT-FFR to guide treatment for coronary artery disease (CAD), aiming to reduce unnecessary procedures.

Keywords:
Coronary artery disease (CAD)computed tomography angiographyfractional flow reserve (FFR)major adverse cardiac events (MACEs)myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI)

More Related Videos

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats
09:28

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats

Published on: May 6, 2021

4.8K
Precision of In Vivo Quantitative Tooth Wear Measurement Using Intra-Oral Scans
09:10

Precision of In Vivo Quantitative Tooth Wear Measurement Using Intra-Oral Scans

Published on: July 12, 2022

3.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 27, 2025

Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform
07:57

Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform

Published on: March 24, 2022

2.9K
A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats
09:28

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats

Published on: May 6, 2021

4.8K
Precision of In Vivo Quantitative Tooth Wear Measurement Using Intra-Oral Scans
09:10

Precision of In Vivo Quantitative Tooth Wear Measurement Using Intra-Oral Scans

Published on: July 12, 2022

3.1K

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Radiology
  • Interventional Cardiology

Background:

  • Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) combined with dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging (CT-MPI) and CCTA combined with CT fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) are emerging as efficient one-stop shop imaging strategies.
  • Patients with intermediate to high pretest probability of coronary artery disease (CAD) require optimal diagnostic strategies to guide clinical management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the superiority of CCTA + dynamic CT-MPI versus CCTA + CT-FFR in guiding treatment for patients with intermediate to high pretest probability of CAD.
  • To compare the clinical value and prognostic discrimination of these two CT-based strategies.

Main Methods:

  • A multicenter, prospective, randomized study (CT-PRECISION) enrolling 412 patients.
  • Patients randomized to either CCTA + dynamic CT-MPI or CCTA + CT-FFR arms.
  • Primary endpoint: rate of unnecessary invasive coronary angiography (ICA) within 90 days.

Main Results:

  • The study aims to evaluate the rate of unnecessary invasive coronary angiography (ICA) as a primary endpoint.
  • Secondary endpoints include major adverse cardiac events (MACE), symptom changes, revascularization rates, and cost-effectiveness.

Conclusions:

  • The CT-PRECISION study will provide crucial information on the optimal CT-based diagnostic strategy for managing patients with intermediate to high pretest probability of CAD.
  • Findings will inform clinical decision-making and potentially reduce unnecessary invasive procedures.