Going "Up" to Move Forward: S-1 Bifactor Models and the Study of Neurocognitive Abilities in Psychopathology
Darren Haywood1,2,3, Frank D Baughman1, Barbara A Mullan1,2
1Discipline of Psychology, School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth 6845, Australia.
Abstract:
Recently, structural models of psychopathology, that address the diagnostic stability and comorbidity issues of the traditional nosological approach, have dominated much of the psychopathology literature. Structural approaches have given rise to the p-factor, which is claimed to reflect an individual's propensity toward all common psychopathological symptoms. Neurocognitive abilities are argued to be important to the development and maintenance of a wide range of disorders, and have been suggested as an important driver of the p-factor. However, recent evidence argues against p being an interpretable substantive construct, limiting conclusions that can be drawn from associations between p, the specific factors of a psychopathology model, and neurocognitive abilities. Here, we argue for the use of the S-1 bifactor approach, where the general factor is defined by neurocognitive abilities, to explore the association between neurocognitive performance and a wide range of psychopathological symptoms. We use simulation techniques to give examples of how S-1 bifactor models can be used to examine this relationship, and how the results can be interpreted.
Related Concept Videos
Factorial Design
Factors Affecting Illness
For instance, risk factors are connected to illness,...
Cattell's 16 Personality Factors
In contrast, source traits are the...
Measures of Intelligence
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this;...
Biological Influences on Intelligence
Binet's Contribution to Measures of Intelligence


