Impact of Communication Method and Timeliness on Student and Faculty Perception of Professionalism and Value

Objective. This study sought to evaluate the impact of faculty, preceptor, and student preferences for type of communication received and timeliness of communication on their perceptions of professionalism and personal value.Methods. An anonymous questionnaire was designed to assess pharmacy faculty, preceptor, and students' preferred method of communication, response time expectations, impact on their perception of the sender's professionalism, and personal perception of being valued. The questionnaire was sent to 924 faculty, preceptors, and students.Results. Of the 253 responses received, 27 (11%) were from full-time faculty, 94 (37%) from part-time faculty preceptors, and 132 (52%) from students. Overall, email was the preferred communication method for receiving information that was not time sensitive (98%), with a majority of faculty, preceptors, and students indicating that 48 hours was a reasonable response time. Most participants felt that less than 24 hours was a reasonable response time for texts or phone calls. Most students indicated that response time was somewhat or not impactful (58%) on their view of the faculty or preceptor's professionalism, while faculty and preceptors indicated that response time was neutral or somewhat impactful on their view of the student's professionalism (60%). Most students (77%) indicated that a faculty or preceptor's response time to their text or phone call impacted their perceptions of feeling valued and important.Conclusion. Communication preferences among faculty, preceptors, and students differ. Professionalism related to communication was important to all groups, and timeliness of communication between faculty, preceptors, and students impacted their perception of their value and self-worth.