Kinematic I and Oxford knee arthroplasty. A 5-8-year follow-up study

Sixty-seven consecutive Oxford Meniscal total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) were compared prospectively with 66 Kinematic I TKAs. At follow-up examination an average of 5.5 (range, 5-8) years later, 20 (30%) of the Oxford Meniscal TKAs had been revised (nine due to aseptic loosenings, seven to aseptic loosening and patellofemoral syndrome, two to patellofemoral syndrome, one to meniscal bearing dislocation, and one to sepsis) and in 16% one or more of the remaining tibial components was radiographically at risk. Three (5%) Kinematic I TKAs had been reoperated upon (one for anterior dislocation, one for a loose patellar component, and one for sepsis) and no component was considered radiographically at risk. The remaining cases demonstrated good and excellent knee ratings (Oxford, 82 +/- 11; Kinematic I, 88 +/- 6; P less than .01; Hospital for Special Surgery). This study suggests that the results of Kinematic I TKA are superior to those of Oxford Meniscal TKA; that patellofemoral resurfacing is advisable; and that Kinematic I TKA yields 5-year data comparable to those of total hip arthroplasty.