Fixed-head and bipolar hip endoprostheses. A retrospective clinical and roentgenographic study

A retrospective review of 1,001 hip hemiarthroplasties was performed. The prosthetic designs were grouped into fixed-head types (682 cases) and bipolar types (319 cases) for comparison. The main indications for operation were femoral neck fracture and avascular necrosis of the femoral head. Clinical and roentgenographic data for different follow-up periods were compared between prosthetic types, using multivariate analysis. Roentgenographic loosening of the femoral component was noted in 25.4% of cases but was significantly higher (P less than .05) in the bipolar groups for a follow-up period less than 2 years, regardless of the method of fixation. The acetabular erosion rate was significantly higher (P less than .05) in the fixed head group, but this finding was related to length of follow-up period, bone porosity, and prosthesis/acetabulum fit. The reoperation rate, including revision to total hip arthroplasty, was higher in the fixed-head group (12.5%) than the bipolar group (7.2%). Based on Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis, 13.7% of the bipolar and 22.9% of the fixed-head hip endoprostheses are expected to be reoperated 8 years after initial implantation. Cement fixation of the femoral component led to a higher prosthesis survival rate, regardless of type. Both prosthetic types are useful in hip surgery, but the bipolar type appears to be indicated in younger and more active patients, whereas the fixed-head design is more suitable for older patients with femoral neck fractures.