Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 27, 2025

Silencing of BRCA2 to Identify Novel BRCA2-regulated Biological Functions in Cultured Human Cells
Published on: August 12, 2015
Niraparib for Advanced Breast Cancer with Germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations: the EORTC 1307-BCG/BIG5-13/TESARO
Nicholas C Turner1, Judith Balmaña2, Coralie Poncet3
1Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden, London, United Kingdom.
Purpose:
To investigate the activity of niraparib in patients with germline-mutated BRCA1/2 (gBRCAm) advanced breast cancer.
Patients And Methods:
BRAVO was a randomized, open-label phase III trial. Eligible patients had gBRCAm and HER2-negative advanced breast cancer previously treated with ≤2 prior lines of chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer or had relapsed within 12 months of adjuvant chemotherapy, and were randomized 2:1 between niraparib and physician's choice chemotherapy (PC; monotherapy with eribulin, capecitabine, vinorelbine, or gemcitabine). Patients with hormone receptor-positive tumors had to have received ≥1 line of endocrine therapy and progressed during this treatment in the metastatic setting or relapsed within 1 year of (neo)adjuvant treatment. The primary endpoint was centrally assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), PFS by local assessment (local-PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety.
Results:
After the pre-planned interim analysis, recruitment was halted on the basis of futility, noting a high degree of discordance between local and central PFS assessment in the PC arm that resulted in informative censoring. At the final analysis (median follow-up, 19.9 months), median centrally assessed PFS was 4.1 months in the niraparib arm (n = 141) versus 3.1 months in the PC arm [n = 74; hazard ratio (HR), 0.96; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.65-1.44; P = 0.86]. HRs for OS and local-PFS were 0.95 (95% CI, 0.63-1.42) and 0.65 (95% CI, 0.46-0.93), respectively. ORR was 35% (95% CI, 26-45) with niraparib and 31% (95% CI, 19-46) in the PC arm.
Conclusions:
Informative censoring in the control arm prevented accurate assessment of the trial hypothesis, although there was clear evidence of niraparib's activity in this patient population.
Insights
Niraparib showed activity in patients with advanced breast cancer with germline BRCA mutations. Despite informative censoring in the control arm, the study suggests niraparib is a viable treatment option.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Clinical Trials
- Genetics
Background:
- Advanced breast cancer with germline BRCA mutations (gBRCAm) presents a significant therapeutic challenge.
- PARP inhibitors like niraparib have shown promise in this patient population.
- Evaluating niraparib's efficacy against physician's choice chemotherapy is crucial for treatment optimization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the efficacy and safety of niraparib compared to physician's choice chemotherapy in patients with gBRCAm advanced breast cancer.
- To determine the impact of niraparib on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
Main Methods:
- The BRAVO trial was a randomized, open-label, phase III study comparing niraparib to physician's choice chemotherapy.
- Eligible patients had HER2-negative advanced breast cancer with gBRCAm and prior chemotherapy exposure.
- The primary endpoint was centrally assessed PFS, with secondary endpoints including OS, local-PFS, objective response rate (ORR), and safety.
Main Results:
- Recruitment was halted due to futility and informative censoring in the control arm.
- Median centrally assessed PFS was 4.1 months for niraparib versus 3.1 months for physician's choice chemotherapy (HR, 0.96).
- Objective response rate was 35% with niraparib compared to 31% with physician's choice chemotherapy.
Conclusions:
- Informative censoring in the control arm limited definitive hypothesis assessment.
- Despite this, the study provides evidence of niraparib's activity in patients with gBRCAm advanced breast cancer.
- Niraparib demonstrates potential as a treatment option for this patient group.
More Related Videos
06:15Tumor Treating Field Therapy in Combination with Bevacizumab for the Treatment of Recurrent Glioblastoma
Published on: October 27, 2014
08:15gDNA Enrichment by a Transposase-based Technology for NGS Analysis of the Whole Sequence of BRCA1, BRCA2, and 9 Genes Involved in DNA Damage Repair
Published on: October 6, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...