Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 26, 2025

09:07
Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
Published on: September 16, 2015
9.2K
Economic Policy Uncertainty Index Meets Ensemble Learning.
Ivana Lolić1, Petar Sorić1, Marija Logarušić1
1Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, Trg J.F.Kennedya 6, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Summary
Machine learning, including linear regression (LM) and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), enhances the Economic Policy Uncertainty (EPU) index. These methods improve EPU
Area of Science:
- Economics
- Data Science
- Computational Social Science
Background:
- The Economic Policy Uncertainty (EPU) index is a crucial metric for understanding economic dynamics.
- Traditional EPU calculations may not fully capture the complexity of uncertainty.
- Ensemble learning and gradient boosting techniques offer advanced methods for predictive modeling.
Purpose of the Study:
- To enhance the predictive accuracy of the Economic Policy Uncertainty (EPU) index.
- To compare the performance of various ensemble learning and gradient boosting techniques in modeling EPU.
- To investigate the relationship between media-based EPU and financial volatility versus consumer sentiment.
Main Methods:
- Utilized ensemble learning techniques: ensemble linear regression (LM) and random forest.
- Employed gradient boosting techniques: Gradient Boosting Decision Tree and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost).
- Applied methods to the Newsbank media database, expanding the scope of search terms for EPU calculation.
Main Results:
- LM and XGBoost models significantly outperformed other methods and the original EPU index.
- Enhanced EPU estimates demonstrated stronger countercyclicality and leading properties.
- EPU showed a higher correlation with financial volatility than with consumer uncertainty assessments, indicating media's focus on financial markets.
- Widening the keyword scope and using ensemble learning improved EPU's correlation with uncertainty proxies.
- Models performed better in monthly predictions (industrial production growth) than quarterly (GDP growth), suggesting uncertainty is a short-term phenomenon.
Conclusions:
- Ensemble learning, particularly LM and XGBoost, offers a superior approach to calculating and predicting the EPU index.
- The enhanced EPU is a more accurate and timely indicator of economic uncertainty, especially in short-term financial contexts.
- Findings highlight the media's emphasis on financial sector volatility in shaping public perception of economic uncertainty.
Related Concept Videos
Uncertainty: Overview
1.2K
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
1.2K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals
7.4K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
7.4K
Econometric Views (EViews)
313
Econometric Views, often stylized as EViews, is a package that merges statistical analysis with econometric studies. It is designed to provide tools for time series analysis, forecasting, and econometric model simulation. The software originated from MicroTSP software and has evolved significantly since its inception in 1981. The history of EViews is marked by a continuous effort to enhance its computational speed and user interface. It was initially developed for large computing systems but...
313
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
1.1K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.1K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error
1.3K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
1.3K
Prediction Intervals
2.5K
The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
2.5K

