Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 26, 2025

Lung CT Segmentation to Identify Consolidations and Ground Glass Areas for Quantitative Assesment of SARS-CoV Pneumonia
Published on: December 19, 2020
Comparative Characterization and Risk Stratification of Asymptomatic and Presymptomatic Patients With COVID-19
Lei Shi1, Rong Ding2,3, Tingting Zhang2,3
1Affiliated First People's Hospital of Kunshan, Gusu College of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou, China.
Insights
A new risk-stratification model effectively distinguishes asymptomatic, severe presymptomatic, and non-severe presymptomatic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients using laboratory indicators. This aids in optimizing clinical management and prognosis for COVID-19.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Clinical Medicine
- Immunology
Background:
- Accurate identification of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patient categories is crucial for effective clinical management and prognosis.
- Distinguishing between asymptomatic, presymptomatic, and symptomatic COVID-19 cases presents diagnostic challenges.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate a risk-stratification model for classifying COVID-19 patients into asymptomatic, severe presymptomatic, and non-severe presymptomatic groups upon admission.
- To investigate the correlation between CD8+ T cell exhaustion and COVID-19 progression.
Main Methods:
- A single-center case series of 2,980 hospitalized COVID-19 patients.
- Development of a two-step risk-stratification model using 10 laboratory indicators.
- Analysis of differential diagnosis models and single-cell data.
Main Results:
- A risk-stratification model demonstrated high accuracy in distinguishing between asymptomatic and presymptomatic patients (AUC = 0.89).
- The model successfully stratified presymptomatic patients into severe and non-severe groups (AUC = 0.82).
- CD8+ T cell exhaustion was identified as a factor correlating with COVID-19 progression.
Conclusions:
- A validated two-step risk-stratification model using laboratory indicators can effectively classify COVID-19 patients upon admission.
- This model aids in optimizing risk-stratified clinical management and improving patient prognosis.
- Understanding immune cell dynamics, such as CD8+ T cell exhaustion, offers insights into disease progression.
Abstract:
The identification of asymptomatic, non-severe presymptomatic, and severe presymptomatic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients may help optimize risk-stratified clinical management and improve prognosis. This single-center case series from Wuhan Huoshenshan Hospital, China, included 2,980 patients with COVID-19 who were hospitalized between February 4, 2020 and April 10, 2020. Patients were diagnosed as asymptomatic (n = 39), presymptomatic (n = 34), and symptomatic (n = 2,907) upon admission. This study provided an overview of asymptomatic, presymptomatic, and symptomatic COVID-19 patients, including detection, demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcomes. Upon admission, there was no significant difference in clinical symptoms and CT image between asymptomatic and presymptomatic patients for diagnosis reference. The mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the differential diagnosis model to discriminate presymptomatic patients from asymptomatic patients was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.81-0.98). Importantly, the severe and non-severe presymptomatic patients can be further stratified (AUC = 0.82). In conclusion, the two-step risk-stratification model based on 10 laboratory indicators can distinguish among asymptomatic, severe presymptomatic, and non-severe presymptomatic COVID-19 patients on admission. Moreover, single-cell data analyses revealed that the CD8+T cell exhaustion correlated to the progression of COVID-19.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms-SNPs
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Bias in Epidemiological Studies

