Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 26, 2025

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Application value of NRS2002 and PG-SGA in nutritional assessment for patients with cervical cancer surgery
Min Tian1,2, Huaping Fu1,2, Juan Du3,2
1Department of VIP Gynecology Nursing, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University Chengdu 610066, Sichuan, China.
Objective:
This study explored and analyzed the application value of nutritional risk screening 2002 (NRS2002) and patient-generated subjective nutrition assessment (PG-SGA) in nutritional assessment for patients with cervical cancer surgery.
Methods:
A total of 165 cervical cancer patients that received elective cervical cancer surgery from February 2017 to December 2019 were chosen as the research subjects. NRS 2002 and PG-SGA were employed to evaluate the nutritional status of patients, and detect their nutrition-related laboratory examination indexes. By using albumin (ALB)≤30 g/L as the criterion of malnutrition, the accuracy of NRS2002 and PG-SGA in evaluating the nutritional status of patients was analyzed.
Results:
The differences between scores of NRS2002 and PG-SGA in age, BMI, tumor stage, pelvic lymph node metastasis were statistically significant (P<0.05); while the difference between scores of NRS2002 and PG-SGA in different education degree, pathological type and growth type of patients was statistically insignificant (P>0.05). By using ALB≤30 g/L as the gold standard to determine malnutrition, 64 malnourished patients were detected, with a detection rate of 38.79%. Compared with this gold standard, the judgment of NRS 2002 and PG-SGA have high consistency with the gold standard, and the Youden indexes were 0.550 and 0.795 respectively. In addition, the nutritional or malnutrition risk of cervical cancer patients was assessed by NRS2002 and PG-SGA, respectively. Among them, 33 patients received co-diagnosis, the results had remarkably correlation (P<0.05) with contingency coefficient r of 0.523.
Conclusion:
Both NRS2002 and PG-SGA are suitable for preoperative nutritional risk screening of patients with cervical cancer surgery. PG-SGA has a higher positive rate but poor time requirement than that of RS2002. Therefore, clinicians can choose the appropriate tool on the basis of an individual patient's situation for nutritional assessment.
Related Concept Videos
Enteral Nutrition I: Orogastric and Nasogastric Feeding
Orogastric (OG) and nasogastric (NG) feeding are two standard methods used for enteral nutrition. Enteral nutrition is often preferred over...
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube...
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management
Cancer Survival Analysis

