Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 26, 2025

Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts
Published on: July 25, 2020
A Real-World Evidence Study of CDK4/6 Inhibitor Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Metastatic Breast Cancer by
Jenna M Collins1, Beth L Nordstrom2, Kimmie K McLaurin3
1Evidera, 500 Totten Pond Road, 5th Floor, Waltham, MA, 02451, USA. jenna.collins@evidera.com.
Introduction:
Limited data exist on real-world treatment patterns and the effectiveness of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors in germline BRCA (gBRCA)-mutated breast cancer.
Methods:
Adults with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) treated with CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy between 2013 and 2018 were retrospectively selected from the Flatiron Health database. Patients with known gBRCA status were classified as mutated (gBRCAm) or wild type (gBRCAwt). Time-to-first subsequent therapy or death (TFST) and overall survival (OS) were calculated from the earliest line of therapy with a CDK4/6 inhibitor.
Results:
Of 2968 patients with HR+/HER2- mBC receiving a CDK4/6 inhibitor, 859 (28.9%) had known gBRCA status, of whom 9.9% were gBRCAm and 90.1% gBRCAwt. Median (95% confidence interval [CI]) TFST was 10 (7-11) months in the gBRCAm group, 10 (9-11) months in the gBRCAwt group, and 11 (10-12) months in the combined gBRCAwt and unknown gBRCA group; median (95% CI) OS was 26 (21-not estimated), 37 (31-51), and 33 (31-35) months, respectively. Cox models indicated the gBRCAm group had shorter TFST (stratified hazard ratio [sHR] 1.24; 95% CI 0.96-1.59) and OS (sHR 1.50; 95% CI 1.06-2.14) than the gBRCAwt group. The gBRCAm group had shorter TFST (sHR 1.38; 95% CI 1.08-1.75) and OS (sHR 1.22; 95% CI 0.88-1.71) than the combined group.
Conclusion:
The results of this real-world study suggest that treatment outcomes with CDK4/6 inhibitors may be worse in patients with gBRCAm mBC than in their counterparts with gBRCAwt and unknown gBRCA status, suggesting potential differences in tumor biology. This result highlights the unmet need in patients with gBRCAm requiring optimized treatment selection and sequencing. Future exploration in larger samples of patients who have had biomarker testing is warranted.
Insights
Patients with germline BRCA (gBRCA)-mutated metastatic breast cancer (mBC) receiving CDK4/6 inhibitors showed poorer outcomes. This real-world study highlights an unmet need for optimized treatments in this gBRCAm mBC population.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Genetics
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Limited real-world data exist on CDK4/6 inhibitor effectiveness in germline BRCA (gBRCA)-mutated breast cancer.
- Understanding treatment patterns is crucial for optimizing care in HR+/HER2- mBC patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate real-world treatment patterns and effectiveness of CDK4/6 inhibitors in patients with gBRCA-mutated HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer.
- To compare outcomes between gBRCA-mutated (gBRCAm) and wild-type (gBRCAwt) or unknown gBRCA status patients.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of adult patients with HR+/HER2- mBC treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors (2013-2018) from the Flatiron Health database.
- Patients were classified based on known germline BRCA status (gBRCAm vs. gBRCAwt).
- Time-to-first subsequent therapy or death (TFST) and overall survival (OS) were calculated and compared between groups.
Main Results:
- Of 2968 patients, 859 had known gBRCA status (9.9% gBRCAm).
- Median TFST was 10 months for gBRCAm vs. 10 months for gBRCAwt.
- Median OS was 26 months for gBRCAm vs. 37 months for gBRCAwt.
- Cox models indicated shorter TFST (sHR 1.24) and OS (sHR 1.50) for gBRCAm vs. gBRCAwt patients.
Conclusions:
- Real-world outcomes with CDK4/6 inhibitors may be worse in gBRCAm mBC patients compared to gBRCAwt or unknown status.
- Potential differences in tumor biology may underlie these observed outcomes.
- There is an unmet need for optimized treatment selection and sequencing for patients with gBRCAm mBC.
More Related Videos
09:19Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cancer Drug Sensitization In Vitro and In Vivo
Published on: February 6, 2015
08:15gDNA Enrichment by a Transposase-based Technology for NGS Analysis of the Whole Sequence of BRCA1, BRCA2, and 9 Genes Involved in DNA Damage Repair
Published on: October 6, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Inhibition of Cdk Activity
Cancer Survival Analysis
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Treatment Resistant Cancers