Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 26, 2025

A Rodent Model of The Ross Operation: Syngeneic Pulmonary Artery Graft Implantation in A Systemic Position
Published on: April 1, 2022
Mitral valve replacement in infants and younger children
Ahmed F Elmahrouk1,2, Mohamed H Mashali3,4, Mohamed F Ismail5,6
1Division of Cardiac Surgery, Cardiovascular Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, MBC J-16, P.O. Box: 40047, Jeddah, 21499, Saudi Arabia. Ael-mahrouk@kfshrc.edu.sa.
Mitral valve replacement (MVR) in children under five has low morbidity and mortality. Reoperation risk is linked to valve size and position, not patient age.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Cardiac Surgery
- Valvular Heart Disease
- Congenital Heart Defects
Background:
- Limited data exists on mitral valve replacement (MVR) outcomes in young children.
- Understanding factors influencing MVR success in pediatric populations is crucial for improving patient care.
- Congenital mitral valve abnormalities and associated conditions are significant causes of pediatric heart disease.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the outcomes of mitral valve replacement (MVR) in children younger than 5 years.
- To identify specific factors, such as age, valve size, and implantation position, that affect MVR outcomes in this cohort.
- To assess the long-term morbidity and mortality associated with MVR in very young children.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 29 pediatric patients who underwent MVR between 2002 and 2020.
- Patients were categorized into two age groups: ≤24 months and >24 months.
- Data collected included primary cardiac diagnoses, hemodynamic lesions, valve types, implantation position, and follow-up events, with statistical analysis of reoperation and survival rates.
Main Results:
- The most common diagnoses were isolated congenital mitral valve abnormality (38%) and Shone complex (24%).
- Mitral regurgitation was the predominant lesion (66%).
- Valve size (SHR 0.39, P=0.02) and supra-annular position (SHR 3.1, P=0.049) significantly impacted reoperation risk, while age did not (SHR 0.89, P=0.84). No significant difference in survival was observed based on age or valve size.
Conclusions:
- Mitral valve replacement in children under five years of age is associated with favorable short-term and long-term outcomes, including low morbidity and mortality.
- The risk of reoperation after MVR in young children is influenced by prosthetic valve size and implantation position (supra-annular), rather than the patient's age.
- Further research into optimal valve selection and implantation techniques is warranted to minimize reoperation rates in pediatric MVR patients.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Mitral Valve Prolapse III: Nursing Management
Mitral Valve Prolapse I: Introduction
Mitral Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management

