Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 26, 2025

06:07
Exploring Infant Sensitivity to Visual Language using Eye Tracking and the Preferential Looking Paradigm
Published on: May 15, 2019
8.6K
Additive and multiplicative probabilistic models of infant looking times
Matuš Šimkovic1, Birgit Träuble1
1Department Psychologie, Universität zu Köln, Cologne, Germany.
Peerj
|July 28, 2021
Summary
This study compared additive and multiplicative habituation models in infants, finding the gamma distribution best fits looking time data. Partial-pooling models improved prediction accuracy, suggesting their utility in developmental research.
Area of Science:
- Developmental Psychology
- Cognitive Science
- Statistical Modeling
Background:
- Habituation, a fundamental learning process, is studied in infants using looking time (LT) measures.
- Previous research has utilized additive and multiplicative regression models to analyze habituation, with varying conclusions on their fit and interpretation.
- The choice of probability distribution and modeling approach (e.g., pooling vs. partial pooling) can influence the analysis of LT data.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the goodness-of-fit of additive and multiplicative regression models for infant habituation looking times.
- To evaluate multiple probability distributions (Weibull, gamma, lognormal, normal) within these models.
- To assess the impact of experimental factors (contrast type, number of trials, age) and modeling choices (pooling methods, model complexity) on habituation analysis.
Main Methods:
- An infant habituation experiment was conducted with participants aged 3-11 months, varying contrast types, number of habituation trials, and age cohorts.
- Additive and multiplicative regression models were fitted to looking time data, incorporating various probability distributions.
- Model performance was evaluated using log-likelihood, mean absolute error, predictive accuracy, and parameter correlations. Both non-pooled and partial-pooled (hierarchical) models were compared.
Main Results:
- The gamma distribution demonstrated the best fit and predictive performance among the tested distributions.
- Partial-pooling models yielded more precise predictions and reduced parameter correlations compared to non-pooled models, despite a slightly worse data fit.
- Infants showed stronger dishabituation to luminance contrast changes (dark to bright) than orientation contrast. Dishabituation effects were more pronounced after more habituation trials, though not always statistically robust.
Conclusions:
- The gamma distribution is a suitable choice for modeling infant habituation looking times.
- Partial-pooling (hierarchical) models are recommended for their superior predictive accuracy in developmental studies.
- While multiplicative models are generally preferred for habituation, the choice between additive and multiplicative models may have less impact on statistical inference than previously thought.

