Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Optimal Foraging00:48

Optimal Foraging

12.6K
How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
12.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Bumblebees' orofacial reactions to tastes provide evidence for affective evaluation.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

When a bigger brain is better: The case of bee olfactory learning.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Flexible, abstract rhythm perception in bumble bees.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

Sensitivity analysis enlightens effects of connectivity in a Neural Mass Model under Control-Target mode.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same author

Phenomenal interface theory: a model for basal consciousness.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2025
Same author

Advection, diffusion and linear transport in a single path-sampling Monte-Carlo algorithm: Getting insensitive to geometrical refinement.

PloS one·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 26, 2025

Tactile Conditioning And Movement Analysis Of Antennal Sampling Strategies In Honey Bees Apis mellifera L.
10:14

Tactile Conditioning And Movement Analysis Of Antennal Sampling Strategies In Honey Bees Apis mellifera L.

Published on: December 12, 2012

10.8K

A model of resource partitioning between foraging bees based on learning.

Thibault Dubois1,2, Cristian Pasquaretta1, Andrew B Barron2

  • 1Research Centre on Animal Cognition (CRCA), Centre for Integrative Biology (CBI); CNRS, University Paul Sabatier-Toulouse III, Toulouse, France.

Plos Computational Biology
|July 28, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Agent-based models reveal how bumblebees develop foraging traplines. Negative reinforcement is crucial for resource partitioning in patchy environments, enhancing collective foraging efficiency.

More Related Videos

Behavioural Pharmacology in Classical Conditioning of the Proboscis Extension Response in Honeybees Apis mellifera
10:36

Behavioural Pharmacology in Classical Conditioning of the Proboscis Extension Response in Honeybees Apis mellifera

Published on: January 24, 2011

19.7K
Visual Classical Conditioning in Wood Ants
05:46

Visual Classical Conditioning in Wood Ants

Published on: October 5, 2018

8.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 26, 2025

Tactile Conditioning And Movement Analysis Of Antennal Sampling Strategies In Honey Bees Apis mellifera L.
10:14

Tactile Conditioning And Movement Analysis Of Antennal Sampling Strategies In Honey Bees Apis mellifera L.

Published on: December 12, 2012

10.8K
Behavioural Pharmacology in Classical Conditioning of the Proboscis Extension Response in Honeybees Apis mellifera
10:36

Behavioural Pharmacology in Classical Conditioning of the Proboscis Extension Response in Honeybees Apis mellifera

Published on: January 24, 2011

19.7K
Visual Classical Conditioning in Wood Ants
05:46

Visual Classical Conditioning in Wood Ants

Published on: October 5, 2018

8.6K

Area of Science:

  • Ecology
  • Behavioral Ecology
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Central place foraging pollinators, like bees, create multi-destination routes (traplines) to access patchy floral resources.
  • Individual pollinator trapline formation is well-studied, but population-level resource use remains unclear and challenging to investigate experimentally.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the conditions under which resource partitioning emerges among traplining bee populations.
  • To utilize agent-based models (ABMs) informed by experimental bumblebee foraging data.

Main Methods:

  • Development of agent-based models simulating bumblebee foraging behavior on artificial flowers.
  • Incorporation of feedback loops influencing movement probabilities between flowers based on reward outcomes.
  • Simulation of both evenly distributed and patchily distributed flower resources.

Main Results:

  • Positive reinforcement of rewarding flower visits is sufficient for resource partitioning with evenly distributed resources.
  • Negative reinforcement of unrewarding flower visits becomes essential for resource partitioning in patchy environments.
  • Complex spatial structures combined with negative experiences promote spatial segregation and efficient collective foraging.

Conclusions:

  • Agent-based models provide insights into population-level pollinator foraging dynamics.
  • Negative feedback is critical for efficient resource partitioning and collective foraging in complex environments.
  • This modeling approach can guide future experimental research on pollinator behavior.