Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview01:08

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview

1.1K
In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
1.1K
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling01:17

Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling

1.1K
Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
1.1K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)01:20

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)

1.2K
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
1.2K
Electric Field at the Surface of a Conductor01:26

Electric Field at the Surface of a Conductor

4.9K
Consider a conductor in electrostatic equilibrium. The net electric field inside a conductor vanishes, and extra charges on the conductor reside on its outer surface, regardless of where they originate.
In the 19th century, Michael Faraday conducted the famous ice pail experiment to prove that the charges always reside on the surface of a conductor. The experimental set-up consists of a conducting uncharged container mounted on an insulating stand. The outer surface of the container is...
4.9K
Magnetic Field due to Moving Charges01:23

Magnetic Field due to Moving Charges

10.5K
A stationary charge creates and interacts with the electric field, while a moving charge creates a magnetic field.
Consider a point charge moving with a constant velocity. Like the electric field, the magnetic field at any point is directly proportional to the magnitude of the charge and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between the source point and the field point. However, unlike the electric field, the magnetic field is always perpendicular to the plane containing the line...
10.5K
Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Spin State Overview01:03

Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Spin State Overview

1.3K
NMR-active nuclei have energy levels called 'spin states' that are associated with the orientations of their nuclear magnetic moments. In the absence of a magnetic field, the nuclear magnetic moments are randomly oriented, and the spin states are degenerate. When an external magnetic field is applied, the spin states have only 2 + 1 orientations available to them. A proton with = ½ has two available orientations. Similarly, for a quadrupolar nucleus with a nuclear spin value of...
1.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Voltage-Induced Villari Effect and Hierarchical Magnetization States in a Ferroelectric-Integrated Metallic Superlattice with Perpendicular Magnetic Anisotropy.

Nanotechnology·2026
Same author

Correction to "Cryogenic Magnetization Dynamics in Chemically Stabilized, Tensile-Strained Ultrathin Yttrium Iron Garnets with Tunable Magnetic Anisotropy".

ACS applied materials & interfaces·2026
Same author

Cryogenic Magnetization Dynamics in Chemically Stabilized, Tensile-Strained Ultrathin Yttrium Iron Garnets with Tunable Magnetic Anisotropy.

ACS applied materials & interfaces·2026
Same author

On-Chip Direct Synthesis of 2D Semimetals for van der Waals Metal-Semiconductor Junction Transistor Arrays.

ACS nano·2026
Same author

Tuning Electronic Skeleton Properties of Porphyrin Covalent Organic Frameworks (COFs) for High-Performance Selective Gas Chemiresistive Sensing.

Nano letters·2026
Same author

Electric Field Modulation of Interlayer Coupling via Piezostrain in a Synthetic Antiferromagnet.

Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 26, 2025

Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser
09:00

Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser

Published on: June 28, 2018

10.1K

Pure Spin Currents Driven by Colossal Spin-Orbit Coupling on Two-Dimensional Surface Conducting SrTiO3.

Mi-Jin Jin1, Doo-Seung Um2, Kohei Ohnishi1,3

  • 1Department of Materials Science and Metallurgy, University of Cambridge, 27 Charles Babbage Road, Cambridge CB3 0FS, United Kingdom.

Nano Letters
|July 28, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Researchers demonstrate nonlocal spin transport in strontium titanate (SrTiO3) using the spin Hall effect. This study reveals anisotropic spin signals and provides key spin transport parameters for this material.

Keywords:
2-Dimensional Conducting OxideOxide Surface and InterfaceSpin Hall effectSpin precessionSpin−Orbit Interaction

More Related Videos

Visualizing Uniaxial-strain Manipulation of Antiferromagnetic Domains in Fe1+YTe Using a Spin-polarized Scanning Tunneling Microscope
09:06

Visualizing Uniaxial-strain Manipulation of Antiferromagnetic Domains in Fe1+YTe Using a Spin-polarized Scanning Tunneling Microscope

Published on: March 24, 2019

8.3K
Scanning SQUID Study of Vortex Manipulation by Local Contact
06:53

Scanning SQUID Study of Vortex Manipulation by Local Contact

Published on: February 1, 2017

7.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 26, 2025

Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser
09:00

Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser

Published on: June 28, 2018

10.1K
Visualizing Uniaxial-strain Manipulation of Antiferromagnetic Domains in Fe1+YTe Using a Spin-polarized Scanning Tunneling Microscope
09:06

Visualizing Uniaxial-strain Manipulation of Antiferromagnetic Domains in Fe1+YTe Using a Spin-polarized Scanning Tunneling Microscope

Published on: March 24, 2019

8.3K
Scanning SQUID Study of Vortex Manipulation by Local Contact
06:53

Scanning SQUID Study of Vortex Manipulation by Local Contact

Published on: February 1, 2017

7.0K

Area of Science:

  • Condensed Matter Physics
  • Materials Science
  • Spintronics

Background:

  • Spin accumulation and pure spin currents are crucial for spintronic devices.
  • Traditional methods involve ferromagnetic spin injectors, limiting device integration.
  • Two-dimensional electron systems offer novel platforms for spin transport studies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate nonlocal spin transport in two-dimensional surface-conducting SrTiO3 (STO).
  • To explore spin generation and detection without ferromagnetic materials, utilizing the spin Hall effect.
  • To characterize spin transport properties in STO, including spin lifetime and diffusion length.

Main Methods:

  • Nonlocal spin transport measurements on Hall bars of surface-conducting STO.
  • Utilized the spin Hall effect (and inverse spin Hall effect) for spin current generation and detection.
  • Applied magnetic fields at various angles to probe spin precession (Hanle effect) and anisotropy.

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated nonlocal spin transport in STO without a ferromagnetic spin-injector.
  • Observed an anisotropic spin signal, consistent with pure spin current Hanle precession.
  • Extracted key parameters: spin Hall angle (γ ≈ 0.25 ± 0.05), spin lifetime (τ ∼ 49 ps), and spin diffusion length (λs ≈ 1.23 ± 0.7 μm) at 2 K.

Conclusions:

  • Surface-conducting STO is a viable material for nonlocal spin transport via the spin Hall effect.
  • The observed anisotropy confirms the presence and behavior of pure spin currents.
  • Provides essential transport parameters for advancing STO-based spintronic applications.