Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 26, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Multiplex Detection of Respiratory Viruses
Published on: November 10, 2023
Over- and under-estimation of COVID-19 deaths
John P A Ioannidis1,2,3,4,5,6
1Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. jioannid@stanford.edu.
Abstract:
The ratio of COVID-19-attributable deaths versus "true" COVID-19 deaths depends on the synchronicity of the epidemic wave with population mortality; duration of test positivity, diagnostic time window, and testing practices close to and at death; infection prevalence; the extent of diagnosing without testing documentation; and the ratio of overall (all-cause) population mortality rate and infection fatality rate. A nomogram is offered to assess the potential extent of over- and under-counting in different situations. COVID-19 deaths were apparently under-counted early in the pandemic and continue to be under-counted in several countries, especially in Africa, while over-counting probably currently exists for several other countries, especially those with intensive testing and high sensitization and/or incentives for COVID-19 diagnoses. Death attribution in a syndemic like COVID-19 needs great caution. Finally, excess death estimates are subject to substantial annual variability and include also indirect effects of the pandemic and the effects of measures taken.
Related Concept Videos
Unrealistic Optimism Bias
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
The Availability Heuristic
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Regression Toward the Mean

