Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 26, 2025

Screening of Axonal Degeneration in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Using Ultrasonography and Nerve Conduction Studies
Published on: January 11, 2019
Radio-carpal wrist MR arthrography: comparison of ultrasound with fluoroscopy and palpation-guided injections
Abeer Houssein Ali1, Omran Khodary Qenawy2, Waleed Riad Saleh3
1The Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt. abeeryaa@aun.edu.eg.
Objective:
To compare ultrasound- (US), fluoroscopy- (FL), and palpation-guided contrast injection techniques used for dorsal radio-carpal wrist MRA.
Materials And Methods:
Patients with chronic wrist pain were randomized as to which injection technique they underwent into three groups of 50 participants. Dorsal radio-carpal contrast injection was performed under US, FL guidance (one radiologist for each), or palpation guidance by an orthopedic surgeon. The three techniques were compared by procedure time, success rate, number of attempts needed, frequency and grade of extravasation, joint distension, and MRA image quality. Additionally, any change from baseline wrist pain was recorded using the visual analog scale (VAS) at five time points (immediately, 8 h, 24 h, 48 h, and 1 week) after injection.
Results:
One hundred and fifty patients (83 males and 67 females; mean age 29 ± 6.5 years) were included. Success rates for US- and FL-guided injections were 100%, while palpation-guided approach was significantly less successful (72%) (P = 0.02) with significantly more frequent extravasation (56%)(P < 0.001). US guidance was the least time-consuming (6.5 ± 1.6 min) compared to FL guidance (12.5 ± 1.9 min) and palpation guidance (8 ± 1.2 min) (all P < 0.001). The mean number of joint puncture attempts was significantly lower with imaging-guided techniques (1.1 ± 0.24 and 1.2 ± 0.4 for US and FL, P = 0.23) compared to palpation-guided one (1.6 ± 0.8) (P = 0.007). The largest increases in baseline-pain were 8-h post-injection, and US guidance was the least painful at all-time points (all P < 0.05). Joint distension and image quality were significantly better with imaging-guided techniques (P < 0.001 and P = 0.003).
Conclusions:
US-guided radio-carpal injection is a less time-consuming, more tolerable, and successful radiation-free method when compared to FL guidance. Palpation-guided injections require multiple attempts to enter the joint with high failure rates and frequent extravasation.
Related Concept Videos
Ultrasonography
During an ultrasonography procedure, a handheld device called...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System III: X-Ray
Definition and Purpose
An X-ray, or radiograph, is a non-invasive method that uses ionizing radiation to take images of internal structures. It is mainly used in cardiac imaging to examine the heart, lungs, and major blood vessels, aiming to identify abnormalities in the heart's size, shape, and position, such as heart failure, congenital defects, and vascular...
Ultrasound II: Endoscopic Ultrasound and FibroScan
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS):
Assessment of the Abdomen III: Palpation

