Comparison of Two Quantitative PCR-Based Assays for Detection of Minimal Residual Disease in B-Precursor Acute
Ying-Jung Huang1, Ming-Chung Kuo2, Tang-Her Jaing3
1Division of Hematology-Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Abstract:
Two quantitative PCR (qPCR)-based methods, for clonal immunoglobulin or T-cell receptor gene (Ig/TCR) rearrangements and for fusion transcripts, are widely used for the measurement of minimal residual disease (MRD) in patients with B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). MRD of bone marrow samples from 165 patients carrying the three major fusion transcripts, including 74 BCR-ABL1, 54 ETV6-RUNX1, and 37 TCF3-PBX1, was analyzed by using the two qPCR-based methods. The correlation coefficient of both methods was good for TCF3-PBX1 (R2 = 0.8088) and BCR-ABL1 (R2 = 0.8094) ALL and moderate for ETV6-RUNX1 (R2 = 0.5972). The concordance was perfect for TCF3-PBX1 ALL (97.2%), substantially concordant for ETV6-RUNX1 ALL (87.1%), and only moderate for BCR-ABL1 ALL (70.6%). The discordant MRD, positive for only one method with a difference greater than one log, was found in 4 of 93 samples (4.3%) with ETV6-RUNX1, 31 of 245 samples (12.7%) with BCR-ABL1, and none of TCF3-PBX1 ALL. None of the eight non-transplanted patients with BCR-ABL1-MRD (+)/Ig/TCR-MRD (-) with a median follow-up time of 73.5 months had hematologic relapses. Our study showed an excellent MRD concordance between the two qPCR-based methods in TCF3-PBX1 ALL, whereas qPCR for Ig/TCR is more reliable in BCR-ABL1 ALL.
