Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 26, 2025

A Simplified Stepwise Approach to Echo Guidance during Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair
Published on: October 16, 2021
Impact of Diabetes on Outcomes After Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair in Heart Failure: COAPT Trial
Bahira Shahim1, Ori Ben-Yehuda2, Shmuel Chen3
1Clinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York, USA.
Insights
Diabetes worsens outcomes in heart failure patients with secondary mitral regurgitation. However, transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr) with MitraClip consistently reduced death and heart failure hospitalizations in both diabetic and non-diabetic patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Heart Failure Management
Background:
- Diabetes is a known risk factor for adverse outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF).
- The impact of diabetes on the efficacy of transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr) for secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) remains an important clinical question.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether diabetes influences the outcomes of TMVr in patients with HF and SMR.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of TMVr in diabetic versus non-diabetic patients.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of data from the COAPT trial, which randomized HF patients with severe SMR to MitraClip plus guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) or GDMT alone.
- Comparison of 2-year outcomes, including mortality and HF hospitalization, between patients with and without diabetes.
Main Results:
- Diabetic patients (37.3%) had higher 2-year mortality rates compared to non-diabetic patients (40.8% vs 32.3%).
- TMVr consistently reduced 2-year death rates (HR 0.51 in diabetics, HR 0.57 in non-diabetics) and HF hospitalization rates (HR 0.41 in diabetics, HR 0.54 in non-diabetics) regardless of diabetic status.
- Improvements in quality of life and exercise capacity were observed with TMVr in both groups.
Conclusions:
- Diabetic patients with severe SMR and HF have a worse prognosis.
- TMVr using MitraClip provides consistent benefits in reducing mortality, HF hospitalizations, and improving quality of life and functional capacity in both diabetic and non-diabetic patients.
Objectives:
This paper sought to determine whether diabetes influences the outcomes of transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr) in patients with heart failure (HF) and secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR).
Background:
Diabetes is associated with worse outcomes in patients with HF.
Methods:
The COAPT (Cardiovascular Outcomes Assessment of the MitraClip Percutaneous Therapy for Heart Failure Patients With functional Mitral Regurgitation) trial randomized HF patients with 3+ or 4+ SMR to MitraClip plus guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) versus GDMT alone. Two-year outcomes were evaluated in patients with versus without diabetes.
Results:
Of 614 patients, 229 (37.3%) had diabetes. Diabetic patients had higher 2-year rates of death than those without diabetes (40.8% vs 32.3%, respectively; adjusted P = 0.04) and tended to have higher rates of HF hospitalization (HFH) (HFH: 50.1% vs 43.0%, respectively; adjusted P = 0.07). TMVr reduced the 2-year rate of death consistently in patients with (30.3% vs 49.9%, respectively; adjusted HR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.32 to 0.81) and without (27.0% vs 38.3%, respectively; adjusted HR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.39-0.84) diabetes (Pinteraction = 0.72). TMVr also consistently reduced the 2-year rates of HFH in patients with (32.2% vs 54.8%, respectively; adjusted HR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.28-0.58) and without (41.5% vs 59.0%, respectively; adjusted HR: 0.54: 95% CI 0.35-0.82) diabetes (Pinteraction = 0.33). Greater movements in quality-of-life (QOL) and exercise capacity occurred with TMVr than with GDMT alone, regardless of diabetic status.
Conclusions:
Among HF patients with severe SMR in the COAPT trial, those with diabetes had a worse prognosis. Nonetheless, diabetic and nondiabetic patients had consistent reductions in the 2-year rates of death and HFH and improvements in QOL and functional capacity following TMVr treatment using the MitraClip than with maintenance on GDMT alone. (Cardiovascular Outcomes Assessment of the MitraClip Percutaneous Therapy for Heart Failure Patients With Functional Mitral Regurgitation [COAPT]; NCT01626079).
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Stenosis IV: Nursing Management
Mitral Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management

