Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 26, 2025

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter
Published on: September 16, 2025
Corneal stromal thickness changes after myopic laser corneal refractive surgery
Jorge L Alió Del Barrio1, Mario Canto-Cerdan, Mohamed El Bahrawy
1From the Cornea, Cataract and Refractive Surgery Unit, Vissum Alicante, Spain (Alió del Barrio, Canto-Cerdan, El Bahrawy, Casanova, García, Alió), the Division of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Universidad Miguel Hernández, Alicante, Spain (Alió del Barrio, Alió), the Watany Research & Development Center, Cairo, Egypt (El Bahrawy), and the Department of Structures, Construction and Graphical Expression, Technical University of Cartagena, Spain (Cavas).
Purpose:
To evaluate the postoperative behavior of the central corneal stromal thickness after myopic femto-laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) by using combined anterior segment optical coherence tomography and a Placido disk topographer and to compare the accuracy of both laser machines in predicting the real stromal change.
Setting:
Vissum Miranza, Alicante, Spain.
Study Design:
Prospective, observational, comparative study.
Methods:
The VisuMax 500 kHz femtosecond laser (FS) and the Amaris 750 excimer laser were used for the correction of myopia with or without myopic astigmatism. Central and paracentral stromal thicknesses (ST) and 6.0 mm corneal aberrometry were obtained with the MS39 topographer. Laser-predicted stromal consumption was recorded (maximum lenticule thickness for SMILE and central ablation depth for LASIK). Visual and refractive outcomes were also evaluated. Total follow-up was 6 months.
Results:
77 LASIK eyes were matched with 77 SMILE eyes. Mean preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) was -3.92 ± 1.67 diopters (D) for LASIK and -4.02 ± 1.63 D for SMILE (P = .356). After LASIK, ST parameters showed significant rethickening between months 1 and 3 (+4.38 μm for central ST; P < .001), remaining stable thereafter. After SMILE, all ST parameters remained stable from month 1. Stromal ablation prediction was higher for SMILE compared with LASIK for all SE ranges, although postoperatively such differences were significant only for ametropias ≤4 D. At 6 months, mean SMILE laser prediction error was -13.21 ± 7.00 μm, whereas LASIK prediction showed better accuracy (+0.92 ± 8.16 μm; P < .001).
Conclusions:
The accuracy of the Amaris 750 excimer laser in predicting the stromal consumption after LASIK was better than the VisuMax FS laser for SMILE. Although SMILE ST remained stable from month 1, after LASIK, mild stromal rethickening was observed up to the third month.
More Related Videos
05:46Author Spotlight: Advancements in Refractive Surgical Correction for Presbyopia and Exploring Postoperative Visual Acuity
Published on: September 20, 2024
07:51Full-Field Optical Coherence Microscopy for Histology-Like Analysis of Stromal Features in Corneal Grafts
Published on: October 21, 2022