Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 26, 2025

Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
The association between ivabradine and adverse cardiovascular events in acute decompensated HFrEF patients
Chia-Te Liao1,2, Jin-Long Huang3,4, Huai-Wen Liang5
1Division of Cardiology, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan.
Insights
Ivabradine treatment in patients with acute decompensated heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) significantly reduced heart rate and HF symptoms. This real-world study found ivabradine use lowered mortality and rehospitalization risks within one year.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Research
Background:
- Chronic heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) affects many patients, often with elevated heart rates.
- Ivabradine is indicated for chronic HFrEF, but its use in acute decompensated HFrEF is less understood.
- Real-world data is crucial for evaluating treatment effectiveness in diverse patient populations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the effects of ivabradine in patients with acute decompensated HFrEF discharged with the medication.
- To compare cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, and HF rehospitalization rates between ivabradine users and non-users.
- To assess the real-world effectiveness of ivabradine in managing acute HFrEF.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of a multicentre HF database.
- Propensity score matching to control for confounding factors.
- Comparison of 1-year outcomes (mortality, HF rehospitalization) between 292 ivabradine users and 584 non-users.
Main Results:
- Ivabradine users had significantly lower heart rates and improved HF severity scores at 1-year follow-up.
- Ivabradine treatment was associated with significantly reduced 1-year cardiovascular mortality (5.8 vs. 12.2 per 100 person-years) and all-cause mortality (7.2 vs. 14.0 per 100 person-years).
- Total HF rehospitalization rates were also significantly lower in the ivabradine group (42.3 vs. 72.6 per 100 person-years).
Conclusions:
- Predischarge ivabradine prescription in acute decompensated HFrEF is independently associated with lower 1-year all-cause and cardiovascular mortality.
- Real-world data supports ivabradine's role in reducing adverse outcomes in this patient population.
- Ivabradine treatment demonstrates effectiveness in improving heart rate control and reducing mortality and rehospitalization in acute HFrEF.
Aims:
Ivabradine has been used in patients who have chronic heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and concomitant sinus heart rate ≥70 bpm. This administration for acute HFrEF remains a concern. This study used a real-world multicentre database to investigate the effects of ivabradine among patients with acute decompensated HFrEF before discharge.
Methods And Results:
This study retrospectively identified patients with acute decompensated HFrEF who were administered ivabradine at discharge from two multicentre HF databases. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for confounders. Cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, and recurrent HF rehospitalization risks were then compared between those with and without ivabradine treatment. After 1:2 propensity score matching, 876 patients (age, 60.7 ± 14.6 years; female, 23.2%; left ventricular ejection fraction, 28.2% ± 7.8%; and heart rate at discharge, 84.3 ± 13.8 bpm) were included in the final analysis, including 292 and 584 patients with and without ivabradine treatment at discharge, respectively. No significant differences were observed in baseline characteristics between the two groups. At 1 year follow-up, patients in the ivabradine group had significantly lower heart rates (77.6 ± 14.7 vs. 81.1 ± 16.3 bpm; P = 0.005) and lower HF severity symptoms (New York Heart Association Functional class, 2.1 ± 0.7 vs. 2.3 ± 0.9; P < 0.001) than those from the non-ivabradine group. Ivabradine users had significantly lower risks of 1 year cardiovascular mortality (5.8 vs. 12.2 per 100-person year; P = 0.003), all-cause mortality (7.2 vs. 14.0 per 100-person year; P = 0.003), and total HF rehospitalization (42.3 vs. 72.6 per 100-person year; P < 0.001) than non-ivabradine users. Following multivariate analysis, the predischarge prescription of ivabradine remained independently associated with lower 1 year all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.28-0.74; P = 0.002) and cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio, 0.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.24-0.72; P = 0.002).
Conclusions:
The current study findings suggest that ivabradine treatment is associated with reduced risks of cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, and HF rehospitalization within 1 year among patients with acute decompensated HFrEF in real-world populations.
More Related Videos
28:13Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
12:45Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class I Agents as Sodium Channel Blockers
Class 1A Antiarrhythmic Drugs: These drugs work by moderately blocking sodium channels,...
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class IV Agents as Calcium Channel Blockers
Verapamil, a calcium channel blocker, inhibits calcium movement across myocardial cell membranes and vascular smooth muscle. This results in the dilation of coronary and...
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class II Agents as β-Adrenergic Blockers
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers
Antianginal Drugs: Calcium Channel Blockers and Ranolazine
CCBs, a diverse class that includes dihydropyridines (nifedipine) and diphenylalkylamines (verapamil and diltiazem), exert their effect by blocking calcium channels in cardiac and smooth muscle cells. This...