Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

8.3K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
8.3K
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

3.6K
One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
3.6K
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes

6.1K
One-way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples of unequal sizes. However, calculations get complicated when sample sizes are not always the same. So, while performing ANOVA with unequal samples size, the following equation is used:
6.1K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

851
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
851
Observational Studies01:11

Observational Studies

10.2K
Observational studies are a type of analytical study where researchers observe events without any interventions. In other words, the researcher does not influence the response variable or the experiment's outcome.
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
10.2K
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

337
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
337

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Updating "A nationally representative dataset of 1549 Americans aged 18 to 94 on interest in, experience with, and barriers to cogeneration, defined as working with older and younger people for social good" with data on religious identity and service attendance.

Data in brief·2026
Same author

Meaningful voluntary work design and dual pathways for healthy aging (MVP-HA): A cross-sectional and mixed-methods study in Hong Kong.

The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences·2026
Same author

Formal Volunteering Among Economically Marginalized Older Americans: A Scoping Review.

Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society·2026
Same author

Thriving from Work Questionnaire: Validation of a Measure of Worker Wellbeing Among Older U.S. Workers.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2025
Same author

Pre-post data from a cogenerational health outreach program within federally qualified health centers: experiences in the encore intergenerational vaccine corps and assessments of different generations and public issues.

Data in brief·2025
Same author

The Interplay Between Biological Aging and Volunteering Engagement in Predicting Cognitive Performance: Evidence From the Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol Study.

The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 26, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.8K

Volunteering as an Equalizer: A Quasi-Experimental Study Using Propensity Score Analysis.

Seoyoun Kim1, Cal J Halvorsen2

  • 1Department of Sociology, College of Liberal Arts, Texas State University, San Marcos, Texas.

American Journal of Preventive Medicine
|July 31, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Formal volunteering improves health and reduces depression in older adults. Those with lower wealth experience greater health benefits from volunteering than wealthier individuals, suggesting targeted support could maximize positive outcomes.

More Related Videos

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design
07:40

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design

Published on: May 31, 2021

3.5K
Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 26, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.8K
Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design
07:40

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design

Published on: May 31, 2021

3.5K
Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.5K

Area of Science:

  • Gerontology
  • Public Health
  • Sociology

Background:

  • Formal volunteering in later life offers significant physical and psychological well-being benefits.
  • Potential selection bias exists, as wealthier older adults are more likely to volunteer and gain advantages.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address selection bias in volunteering research using inverse probability of treatment weighting.
  • To examine differential impacts of volunteering on health across wealth quintiles.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of Health and Retirement Study data (2004-2016, N=90,881).
  • Utilized machine learning to create weights for estimating treatment effects.
  • Incorporated inverse probability of treatment weighting to adjust for selection bias.

Main Results:

  • Volunteering improved self-reported health and reduced depressive symptoms in the overall sample.
  • Individuals in the lowest wealth quintile showed significantly greater improvements in self-reported health from volunteering compared to wealthier individuals.
  • Volunteering was linked to reduced depressive symptoms irrespective of wealth status.

Conclusions:

  • Formal volunteering enhances health and psychological well-being in older adults.
  • Low-wealth volunteers may experience more substantial health gains, highlighting the importance of addressing barriers to volunteering for this group.
  • Potential hindrances like financial distress or discrimination may limit volunteering benefits for the least wealthy.