Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 26, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Validity of an algorithm to identify cardiovascular deaths from administrative health records: a multi-database
Lisa M Lix1, Shamsia Sobhan2, Audray St-Jean3
1Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. lisa.lix@umanitoba.ca.
Insights
An algorithm using administrative health records to identify cardiovascular deaths showed moderate accuracy. Its validity varied across different healthcare systems and locations, highlighting potential differences in data recording practices.
Area of Science:
- Health Informatics
- Cardiovascular Epidemiology
- Data Science in Healthcare
Background:
- Cardiovascular death is a key outcome in studies of new medical treatments.
- Vital statistics are ideal for mortality data but may not be accessible for linkage.
- Assessing administrative health records for cardiovascular death identification is crucial for population-based research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the validity of an algorithm for identifying cardiovascular deaths using administrative health records.
- To compare algorithm performance against vital statistics registrations as the reference standard.
Main Methods:
- Utilized administrative health records from a cohort study on sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors (2013-2018).
- Included data from five Canadian provinces and the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD).
- Calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for the algorithm, stratifying by site, location of death, sex, and age.
Main Results:
- The algorithm demonstrated moderate overall validity when compared to vital statistics.
- Overall sensitivity was 64.8% and specificity was 74.9%.
- Significant variation in performance was observed across different study sites and healthcare systems.
Conclusions:
- The algorithm for identifying cardiovascular deaths from administrative health records has moderate validity.
- Variations in algorithm performance across sites suggest differences in diagnostic coding and healthcare utilization.
- Further refinement may be needed to improve accuracy in diverse healthcare settings.
Background:
Cardiovascular death is a common outcome in population-based studies about new healthcare interventions or treatments, such as new prescription medications. Vital statistics registration systems are often the preferred source of information about cause-specific mortality because they capture verified information about the deceased, but they may not always be accessible for linkage with other sources of population-based data. We assessed the validity of an algorithm applied to administrative health records for identifying cardiovascular deaths in population-based data.
Methods:
Administrative health records were from an existing multi-database cohort study about sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, a new class of antidiabetic medications. Data were from 2013 to 2018 for five Canadian provinces (Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, Ontario, Quebec) and the United Kingdom (UK) Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). The cardiovascular mortality algorithm was based on in-hospital cardiovascular deaths identified from diagnosis codes and select out-of-hospital deaths. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) were calculated for the cardiovascular mortality algorithm using vital statistics registrations as the reference standard. Overall and stratified estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed; the latter were produced by site, location of death, sex, and age.
Results:
The cohort included 20,607 individuals (58.3% male; 77.2% ≥70 years). When compared to vital statistics registrations, the cardiovascular mortality algorithm had overall sensitivity of 64.8% (95% CI 63.6, 66.0); site-specific estimates ranged from 54.8 to 87.3%. Overall specificity was 74.9% (95% CI 74.1, 75.6) and overall PPV was 54.5% (95% CI 53.7, 55.3), while site-specific PPV ranged from 33.9 to 72.8%. The cardiovascular mortality algorithm had sensitivity of 57.1% (95% CI 55.4, 58.8) for in-hospital deaths and 72.3% (95% CI 70.8, 73.9) for out-of-hospital deaths; specificity was 88.8% (95% CI 88.1, 89.5) for in-hospital deaths and 58.5% (95% CI 57.3, 59.7) for out-of-hospital deaths.
Conclusions:
A cardiovascular mortality algorithm applied to administrative health records had moderate validity when compared to vital statistics data. Substantial variation existed across study sites representing different geographic locations and two healthcare systems. These variations may reflect different diagnostic coding practices and healthcare utilization patterns.
Related Concept Videos
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System I: Subjective Data
Initial Enquiry
Ask the patient about their primary concern and thoroughly explore all reported symptoms.
Medical History
Investigate past illnesses affecting the cardiovascular system, such as angina, anemia, rheumatic fever, congenital heart disease, stroke, thrombophlebitis, dysrhythmias, varicosities
Inquire about symptoms...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies

