Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 26, 2025

A Simplified Stepwise Approach to Echo Guidance during Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair
Published on: October 16, 2021
2021 PACES expert consensus statement on the indications and management of cardiovascular implantable electronic
, Maully J Shah1, Michael J Silka2
1University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Insights
This expert consensus provides updated guidance on cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) for pediatric patients, addressing indications, management, and access challenges in various regions. It emphasizes patient-specific decision-making for appropriate CIED use.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pediatric Electrophysiology
- Medical Device Guidelines
Background:
- Increasing complexity of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) and pediatric patients necessitates updated practice guidelines.
- Existing adult CIED recommendations often differ from pediatric needs, requiring specific delineation.
- Access to CIEDs in low- and middle-income countries presents challenges that need strategic solutions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To update and clarify indications and management strategies for CIEDs in pediatric patients (≤21 years of age).
- To highlight and explain key differences between adult and pediatric CIED recommendations.
- To address barriers to CIED access in resource-limited settings and propose strategies.
Main Methods:
- Development of an expert consensus statement by a writing committee with specialized expertise.
- Recommendations were graded by class and level of evidence, with consensus expert opinion used for rare diseases or non-trial-amenable questions.
- The document underwent extensive review and public comment from relevant professional societies globally.
Main Results:
- The consensus statement provides updated, specific recommendations for CIED indications and management in pediatric populations.
- It clarifies differences between adult and pediatric CIED guidelines, offering rationale for these distinctions.
- Strategies to improve CIED access in low- and middle-income countries are discussed.
Conclusions:
- This consensus document supports clinicians and patients in achieving appropriate CIED use, management, and follow-up in pediatric patients.
- It emphasizes the importance of clinical judgment and patient-specific decision-making alongside recommendations.
- Endorsement by multiple international societies underscores its broad applicability and significance.
Abstract:
In view of the increasing complexity of both cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) and patients in the current era, practice guidelines, by necessity, have become increasingly specific. This document is an expert consensus statement that has been developed to update and further delineate indications and management of CIEDs in pediatric patients, defined as ≤21 years of age, and is intended to focus primarily on the indications for CIEDs in the setting of specific disease categories. The document also highlights variations between previously published adult and pediatric CIED recommendations and provides rationale for underlying important differences. The document addresses some of the deterrents to CIED access in low- and middle-income countries and strategies to circumvent them. The document sections were divided up and drafted by the writing committee members according to their expertise. The recommendations represent the consensus opinion of the entire writing committee, graded by class of recommendation and level of evidence. Several questions addressed in this document either do not lend themselves to clinical trials or are rare disease entities, and in these instances recommendations are based on consensus expert opinion. Furthermore, specific recommendations, even when supported by substantial data, do not replace the need for clinical judgment and patient-specific decision-making. The recommendations were opened for public comment to Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society (PACES) members and underwent external review by the scientific and clinical document committee of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the science advisory and coordinating committee of the American Heart Association (AHA), the American College of Cardiology (ACC), and the Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC). The document received endorsement by all the collaborators and the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), the Indian Heart Rhythm Society (IHRS), and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS). This document is expected to provide support for clinicians and patients to allow for appropriate CIED use, appropriate CIED management, and appropriate CIED follow-up in pediatric patients.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiovascular Drugs: Classification based on Therapeutic Indications
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Endocarditis III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Introduction Cardiac Emergencies
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management

