Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 26, 2025

Conducting Elevated Temperature Normal and Combined Pressure-Shear Plate Impact Experiments Via a Breech-end Sabot Heater System
Published on: August 7, 2018
Firearms and protective orders in intimate partner homicides.
Vivian H Lyons1,2, Avanti Adhia2,3, Caitlin Moe2,4
1Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Most intimate partner homicides (IPH) involve firearms. While protective orders (PO) may reduce risk, firearm removal was rarely documented as a condition in POs, indicating data gaps.
Area of Science:
- Forensic Science
- Public Health
- Criminology
Background:
- Intimate partner homicide (IPH) remains a significant public health concern.
- Protective orders (PO) are legal tools intended to prevent violence, but their effectiveness in IPH cases, particularly concerning firearm use, requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze differences in intimate partner homicides (IPH) based on firearm involvement and the prior issuance of a protective order (PO).
- To examine the characteristics of IPH incidents, perpetrators, and victims in relation to firearm use and PO status.
Main Methods:
- Utilized data from the National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS) from 2003-2018.
- Categorized 8,375 IPH incidents by firearm use (yes/no) and PO status (filed/not filed).
- Reviewed incident narratives for documentation of PO conditions, specifically firearm removal.
Main Results:
- The majority of IPH incidents (53.9%) involved firearms and no prior PO.
- Only 3.3% of IPH victims were killed in incidents with a firearm and a prior PO.
- None of the reviewed POs explicitly mentioned firearm removal, and PO documentation was infrequent in incident narratives.
Conclusions:
- Firearm use is predominant in intimate partner homicides.
- While prior protective orders (PO) are associated with intimate partner homicides (IPH), firearm removal was not documented as a condition in the identified POs.
- Incomplete ascertainment of PO status in the NVDRS highlights a need for improved data collection to better assess the efficacy of POs in preventing IPH.
Related Concept Videos
Relationship Formation
Aggression
Torts II
Personal Protective Equipment
Types of Reports III: Telephone and Verbal Reports
Here's an overview of each type:
Telephone Orders
Ending Relationships

