Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 26, 2025

Passive Administration of Monoclonal Antibodies Against H. capsulatum and Others Fungal Pathogens
Published on: February 14, 2011
When Azoles Cannot Be Used: The Clinical Effectiveness of Intermittent Liposomal Amphotericin Prophylaxis in
R Batchelor1, C Thomas1, B J Gardiner2,3
1Department of General Medicine, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Background:
Patients unable to take azoles are a neglected group lacking a standardized approach to antifungal prophylaxis. We evaluated the effectiveness and safety of intermittent liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB) prophylaxis in a heterogenous group of hematology patients.
Methods:
A retrospective cohort of all hematology patients who received a course of intravenous L-AMB, defined as 1 mg/kg thrice weekly from July 1, 2013 to June 30, 2018, were identified from pharmacy records. Outcomes included breakthrough-invasive fungal disease (BIFD), reasons for premature discontinuation, and acute kidney injury.
Results:
There were 198 patients who received 273 courses of L-AMB prophylaxis. Using a conservative definition, the BIFD rate was 9.6% (n = 19 of 198) occurring either during L-AMB prophylaxis or up to 7 days from cessation in patients who received a course. Probable/proven BIFD occurred in 13 patients (6.6%, 13 of 198), including molds in 54% (n = 7) and non-albicans Candidemia in 46% (n = 6). Cumulative incidence of BIFD was highest in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (6.8%) followed by acute lymphoblastic leukemia (2.7%) and allogeneic stem cell transplantation (2.5%). The most common indication for L-AMB was chemotherapy, or anticancer drug-azole interactions (75% of courses) dominated by vincristine, or acute myeloid leukemia clinical trials, followed by gut absorption concerns (13%) and liver function abnormalities (8.8%). Acute kidney injury, using a modified international definition, complicated 27% of courses but was not clinically significant, accounting for only 3.3% (9 of 273) of discontinuations.
Conclusions:
Our findings demonstrate a high rate of BIFD among patients receiving L-AMB prophylaxis. Pragmatic trials will help researchers find the optimal regimen of L-AMB prophylaxis for the many clinical scenarios in which azoles are unsuitable, especially as targeted anticancer drugs increase in use.
Insights
Intermittent liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB) prophylaxis showed a high rate of breakthrough-invasive fungal disease (BIFD) in hematology patients unable to take azoles. Further trials are needed to optimize L-AMB regimens.
Area of Science:
- Hematology
- Infectious Diseases
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Azole antifungals are standard prophylaxis, but patient intolerance necessitates alternatives.
- Hematology patients often have contraindications to azoles, creating a need for alternative antifungal strategies.
- Liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB) is a potential option for prophylaxis in this population.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of intermittent liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB) prophylaxis.
- To assess breakthrough-invasive fungal disease (BIFD) rates and acute kidney injury in hematology patients receiving L-AMB.
- To identify common indications for L-AMB use in this patient group.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study of hematology patients receiving intravenous L-AMB (1 mg/kg thrice weekly) from July 2013 to June 2018.
- Outcomes included breakthrough-invasive fungal disease (BIFD), reasons for discontinuation, and acute kidney injury.
- Data were extracted from pharmacy records for 198 patients who received 273 L-AMB courses.
Main Results:
- A BIFD rate of 9.6% was observed during or shortly after L-AMB prophylaxis.
- Probable/proven BIFD occurred in 6.6% of patients, with molds and non-albicans Candida species being common pathogens.
- Acute kidney injury occurred in 27% of courses but rarely led to discontinuation (3.3%).
Conclusions:
- Intermittent L-AMB prophylaxis is associated with a high incidence of BIFD in hematology patients.
- The most frequent indications for L-AMB were chemotherapy/drug interactions and intolerance to azoles.
- Further pragmatic trials are essential to determine optimal L-AMB regimens for patients unsuitable for azoles, especially with increasing use of targeted anticancer drugs.
More Related Videos
08:54Broth Microdilution In Vitro Screening: An Easy and Fast Method to Detect New Antifungal Compounds
Published on: February 14, 2018
06:49Reduced Itraconazole Concentration and Durations Are Successful in Treating Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis Infection in Amphibians
Published on: March 14, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Fungal Phylum Microsporidia
Drug Accumulation During Multiple Dosing: Intermittent IV Infusions
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion