Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 26, 2025

Objective Nociceptive Assessment in Ventilated ICU Patients: A Feasibility Study Using Pupillometry and the Nociceptive Flexion Reflex
Published on: July 4, 2018
Pain Intensity Assessment in Sickle Cell Disease Patients Using Vital Signs During Hospital Visits.
Swati Padhee1, Amanuel Alambo1, Tanvi Banerjee1
1Wright State University, Dayton, USA.
Machine learning models can objectively predict sickle cell disease (SCD) pain intensity using physiological data. This approach offers a more reliable assessment than subjective self-reports, improving patient care.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical Engineering
- Data Science
- Pain Management
Background:
- Sickle cell disease (SCD) pain significantly impacts patient morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs.
- Subjective self-report is the standard for pain assessment but presents challenges for clinicians and can be affected by pain medications.
- Objective physiological measures show promise for predicting pain intensity, particularly with machine learning (ML) techniques.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the generalizability of ML techniques for predicting SCD pain intensity across different hospital visit types (inpatient, outpatient).
- To compare the performance of five classification algorithms in predicting pain levels both within (intra-individual) and between (inter-individual) patients.
- To determine the effectiveness of ML in providing an objective and quantitative pain evaluation for SCD patients.
Main Methods:
- Collected physiological data from 50 SCD patients over an extended period across three hospital visit types.
- Applied and compared five ML classification algorithms to predict pain intensity on an 11-point scale and a 2-point scale (no/mild vs. severe pain).
- Evaluated model performance at both intra-individual and inter-individual levels.
Main Results:
- All tested ML classifiers significantly outperformed chance in predicting pain intensity.
- A Decision Tree (DT) model achieved the highest accuracy: 0.728 (inter-individual) and 0.653 (intra-individual) on an 11-point scale.
- DT accuracy dramatically improved to 0.941 (inter-individual) on a simplified 2-point pain scale.
Conclusions:
- ML techniques demonstrate significant potential for objective and quantitative pain intensity evaluation in SCD patients.
- The generalizability of ML models across various hospital visit types supports their clinical utility.
- Objective pain assessment using ML can overcome limitations of subjective self-reporting, potentially improving pain management strategies.
Related Concept Videos
Introduction to Vital Signs
Vital signs help healthcare professionals assess an individual's well-being and detect any functional changes...
Guidelines For Measuring Vital Signs
Before taking a patient's vital signs, a nurse would consider and assess the patient's comfort level and ensure appropriate equipment is available.
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System III: Palpation
Jugular Venous Pressure (JVP) Measurement
Position the patient at a thirty- to forty-five-degree angle or in a semi-fowler's position. Look for the highest point of pulsation in the internal jugular vein and measure the vertical distance to the angle of Loius or sternal angle. A normal JVP is 3-4 cm above...
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Assessment of apical radial pulse
The A-R pulse assessment involves simultaneous evaluation of the apical and radial pulses. When the apical and radial pulse rates vary, this assessment helps identify a pulse deficit.
Pre-Procedural Preparation
Assessing Blood pressure in the Leg
Preparation:

