Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The United Kingdom Branch Endoprosthesis for Aortic arch Treatment study (UK-BEAT): Early experience with the GORE TAG thoracic branch endoprosthesis.

Journal of vascular surgery·2026
Same author

The effects of socioeconomic deprivation on colorectal cancer outcomes; a retrospective regional cohort study.

International journal of colorectal disease·2026
Same author

Broken and Reassembled: The Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Consequences of Structural Genomic Variation.

Molecular syndromology·2026
Same author

Measles challenges: global resurgence and factors affecting eradication.

Italian journal of pediatrics·2026
Same author

Correlation of Plain Radiographs and 3-Dimensional CT With Coronal and Sagittal Measurements in Patients Undergoing Corrective Osteotomies.

Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine·2026
Same author

Metronidazole is an effective method of analgesia following haemorrhoidectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

International journal of colorectal disease·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 26, 2025

Robotic Left Hepatectomy using Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging for an Intrahepatic Complex Biliary Cyst
11:03

Robotic Left Hepatectomy using Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging for an Intrahepatic Complex Biliary Cyst

Published on: June 24, 2022

5.9K

Robotic versus laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a case-matched study.

Enda Hannan1, Gerard Feeney2, Mohammad Fahad Ullah2

  • 1Department of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospital Limerick, St Nessan's Road, Dooradoyle Co, Limerick, Ireland. endahannan@rcsi.com.

Journal of Robotic Surgery
|August 2, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Robotic right hemicolectomy (RRH) is a safe and feasible alternative to laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (LRH) for right colonic malignancy, showing similar outcomes despite longer initial operative times.

Keywords:
Colon cancerLaparoscopic surgeryRight hemicolectomyRobotic surgery

More Related Videos

Subcostal Specimen Removal in Completely Portal Robotic Lobectomy
04:38

Subcostal Specimen Removal in Completely Portal Robotic Lobectomy

Published on: April 19, 2024

416
Laparoscopic Left Hemihepatectomy Combined with Caudate Lobe Resection
07:22

Laparoscopic Left Hemihepatectomy Combined with Caudate Lobe Resection

Published on: April 11, 2025

418

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 26, 2025

Robotic Left Hepatectomy using Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging for an Intrahepatic Complex Biliary Cyst
11:03

Robotic Left Hepatectomy using Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging for an Intrahepatic Complex Biliary Cyst

Published on: June 24, 2022

5.9K
Subcostal Specimen Removal in Completely Portal Robotic Lobectomy
04:38

Subcostal Specimen Removal in Completely Portal Robotic Lobectomy

Published on: April 19, 2024

416
Laparoscopic Left Hemihepatectomy Combined with Caudate Lobe Resection
07:22

Laparoscopic Left Hemihepatectomy Combined with Caudate Lobe Resection

Published on: April 11, 2025

418

Area of Science:

  • Surgical Oncology
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Colorectal Surgery

Background:

  • Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (LRH) is the standard surgical treatment for right colonic malignancy.
  • Robotic surgery offers potential advantages over laparoscopy, but its application in right hemicolectomy is debated.
  • Existing data on robotic right hemicolectomy (RRH) versus LRH is limited.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the outcomes of robotic right hemicolectomy (RRH) versus laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (LRH) in a university teaching hospital setting.
  • To evaluate perioperative, postoperative, and early oncological outcomes between RRH and LRH.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective database was used to identify patients who underwent RRH or LRH with extracorporeal anastomosis (ECA).
  • Demographic, perioperative, and postoperative data were collected and analyzed.
  • Early oncological outcomes were assessed for both surgical approaches.

Main Results:

  • No significant differences were observed in estimated blood loss, conversion rates, complications, anastomotic leaks, reoperations, mortality, surgical site infections, or length of stay.
  • Surgical specimen quality was favorable in both RRH and LRH groups.
  • RRH had a longer mean operative time, influenced by resident training and patient complexity, but this improved with experience.

Conclusions:

  • Robotic right hemicolectomy (RRH) is a safe and feasible procedure comparable to LRH regarding postoperative morbidity, mortality, and early oncological outcomes.
  • While initial operative times for RRH were longer, this is attributed to the learning curve and patient selection.
  • Intracorporeal anastomosis in RRH may offer further improvements in outcomes compared to LRH.