Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 26, 2025

A Phenotyping Regimen for Genetically Modified Mice Used to Study Genes Implicated in Human Diseases of Aging
Published on: July 14, 2016
Cardiovascular damage phenotypes and all-cause and CVD mortality in older adults
Lindsay M Miller1, Chenkai Wu2, Calvin H Hirsch3
1Division of Nephrology-Hypertension, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; School of Biological and Population Health Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR.
Insights
Identifying distinct cardiovascular damage phenotypes in older adults is crucial. The multisystem morbidity phenotype showed the highest risk for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, highlighting the danger of widespread disease.
Area of Science:
- Gerontology
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors are linked to mortality, but current assessments often overlook subgroup variations.
- Understanding specific combinations of risk factors may illuminate underlying physiological mechanisms of morbidity and mortality in elderly populations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify distinct cardiovascular (CV) damage phenotypes in older adults using latent class analysis (LCA).
- To evaluate the association between these identified CV damage phenotypes and all-cause and CVD-mortality.
Main Methods:
- Latent class analysis (LCA) was used to define CV damage phenotypes in 5067 older adults from the Cardiovascular Health Study.
- Phenotypes were based on probabilities of abnormalities in brain infarctions, echocardiogram, N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide, troponin T, interleukin-6, c-reactive protein, galectin-3, and cystatin C.
- Cox-proportional hazards regression analyzed the link between categorical CV damage phenotypes and mortality outcomes.
Main Results:
- Five CV damage phenotypes were identified: healthy (59%), cardio-renal (11%), cardiac (15%), multisystem morbidity (6%), and inflammatory (9%).
- All non-healthy phenotypes were associated with increased all-cause mortality risk compared to the healthy phenotype.
- The multisystem morbidity phenotype exhibited the highest risk for all-cause mortality (HR: 4.02) and CVD-mortality (HR: 4.90).
Conclusions:
- Five distinct CV damage phenotypes were identified in older adults.
- Multisystem CV damage significantly increases mortality risk compared to single-domain damage.
- These phenotypes offer a refined approach to understanding mortality risk in older populations.
Purpose:
The association between CVD risk factors and mortality is well established, however, current tools for addressing subgroups have focused on the overall burden of disease. The identification of risky combinations of characteristics may lead to a better understanding of physiologic pathways that underlie morbidity and mortality in older adults.
Methods:
Participants included 5067 older adults from the Cardiovascular Health Study, followed for up to 6 years. Using latent class analysis (LCA), we created CV damage phenotypes based on probabilities of abnormal brain infarctions, major echocardiogram abnormalities, N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide, troponin T, interleukin-6, c reactive-protein, galectin-3, cystatin C. We assigned class descriptions based on the probability of having an abnormality among risk factors, such that a healthy phenotype would have low probabilities in all risk factors. Participants were assigned to phenotypes based on the maximum probability of membership. We used Cox-proportional hazards regression to evaluate the association between the categorical CV damage phenotype and all-cause and CVD-mortality.
Results:
The analysis yielded 5 CV damage phenotypes consistent with the following descriptions: healthy (59%), cardio-renal (11%), cardiac (15%), multisystem morbidity (6%), and inflammatory (9%). All four phenotypes were statistically associated with a greater risk of all-cause mortality when compared with the healthy phenotype. The multisystem morbidity phenotype had the greatest risk of all-cause death (HR: 4.02; 95% CI: 3.44, 4.70), and CVD-mortality (HR: 4.90, 95% CI: 3.95, 6.06).
Conclusions:
Five CV damage phenotypes emerged from CVD risk factor measures. CV damage across multiple systems confers a greater mortality risk compared to damage in any single domain.
More Related Videos
09:40Phosphorus-31 Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy: A Tool for Measuring In Vivo Mitochondrial Oxidative Phosphorylation Capacity in Human Skeletal Muscle
Published on: January 19, 2017
06:04Author Spotlight: Assessing the Cardiovascular Profile of Patients with Metabolic Syndrome
Published on: September 27, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Pharmacodynamics in Geriatric Patients: Effects of Age
Pharmacokinetics in Geriatric Patients: Effect of Age on Drug Metabolism
Pharmacokinetics in Geriatric Patients: Effect of Age on Drug Distribution
The Effect of Aging on Tissues
Pharmacokinetics in Geriatric Patients: Effect of Age on Drug Excretion