Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 26, 2025
Laparoscopic Left Hemihepatectomy Combined with Caudate Lobe Resection
Published on: April 11, 2025
The clinical value of regional lymphadenectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
Facai Yang1, Changkang Wu2, Zhiyuan Bo3
1Hepato-pancreato-biliary Center, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University Nanjing, 210009, China; Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, 637000, China.
Objective:
The aim of this study was to explore the clinical value of lymph node dissection (LND) for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).
Methods:
Clinical and pathological data were collected from 147 ICC patients who attended two tertiary centers over the past 5 years. The patients were classified into two groups: the LND group (group A) and the no-performance LND (NLND) group (group B). Clinical and pathological parameters were compared between the two groups to analyze the impact of LND on the long-term survival time of ICC patients.
Results:
Of the 147 patients, 54.4% (80) received LND and 42.5% (34/80) of these were found to have lymph node metastasis (LNM). LND did not increase postoperative complications (27.5%, P = 0.354), but postoperative hospital stays were longer (12.2 ± 6.3 d, P = 0.005) in group A compared with group B (20.9%, 9.5 ± 3.5 d). The 5-year survival rates of groups A and B are almost similar (21% vs 29%, P = 0.905). The overall survival rate of cN0 (diagnosis obtained by imaging) is better than pN1 (diagnosis obtained by histopathology), but lower than pN0 (all P < 0.05). Compared with NLND, the median survival time of LND patients with T1 has not significantly improved (29.3 vs 35.1 months, P = 0.762), but the patients with T2-4 has been significantly increased (29.0 vs 17.1 months, P = 0.040). Elevated CA19-9 level (HR = 1.764, 95% CI: 1.113-2.795, P = 0.016), vascular invasion (HR = 2.697, 95% CI: 1.103-6.599, P = 0.030), and T category (HR = 1.848, 95% CI: 1.059-3.224, P = 0.031) were independent risk factors for poor long-term survival time of the ICC patients (all P values < 0.05).
Conclusion:
ICC patients with cN0 may have LNM, and the long-term survival time of LNM patients is usually poor. We suggest that patients with ICC may require routine LND, especially those with T2-4 category.
