Search research articles

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Phasic LC-NE firing and attentional profiles: a pupillometric study.

Consciousness and cognition·2026

Same author

Zero as a semantic boundary: Rethinking the mental number line.

Psychological research·2026

Same author

Pupil size response within direct and random exploration and exploitation behaviors selectively reflects value of control.

Frontiers in psychology·2026

Same author

The role of subcortical regions in affective empathy.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2025

Same author

The subcortical role in executive functions: Neural mechanisms of executive inhibition in the flanker task.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2024

Same author

Atypical reliance on monocular visual pathway for face and word recognition in developmental dyslexia.

Brain and cognition·2023

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 26, 2025

Behavioral Tracking and Neuromast Imaging of Mexican Cavefish

Behavioral Tracking and Neuromast Imaging of Mexican Cavefish

Published on: April 6, 2019

Magnitude integration in the Archerfish.

Tali Leibovich-Raveh¹, Ashael Raveh^2,3, Dana Vilker²

¹Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Education, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel. talil@edu.haifa.ac.il.

Scientific Reports

|August 3, 2021

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Archerfish decisions are influenced by non-numerical magnitudes, not just numerical quantity. They preferred larger non-numerical sizes over more dots, challenging quantity-as-primary theories.

More Related Videos

Development of New Methods for Quantifying Fish Density Using Underwater Stereo-video Tools

Development of New Methods for Quantifying Fish Density Using Underwater Stereo-video Tools

Published on: November 20, 2017

Long-term Behavioral Tracking of Freely Swimming Weakly Electric Fish

Long-term Behavioral Tracking of Freely Swimming Weakly Electric Fish

Published on: March 6, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 26, 2025

Behavioral Tracking and Neuromast Imaging of Mexican Cavefish

Behavioral Tracking and Neuromast Imaging of Mexican Cavefish

Published on: April 6, 2019

Development of New Methods for Quantifying Fish Density Using Underwater Stereo-video Tools

Development of New Methods for Quantifying Fish Density Using Underwater Stereo-video Tools

Published on: November 20, 2017

Long-term Behavioral Tracking of Freely Swimming Weakly Electric Fish

Long-term Behavioral Tracking of Freely Swimming Weakly Electric Fish

Published on: March 6, 2014

Area of Science:

Cognitive Science
Animal Behavior
Comparative Psychology

Background:

Magnitude-related decisions are crucial for survival and daily life.
Dominant theories emphasize numerical quantity, while alternative theories highlight non-numerical magnitudes.
Animal models offer insights into the primacy of numerical versus non-numerical magnitude processing.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate whether non-numerical magnitudes influence Archerfish decisions in a spontaneous magnitude comparison task.
To determine if the correlation between numerical and non-numerical magnitudes affects decision-making.
To challenge the notion that numerical quantity is the fundamental basis for mathematical abilities.

Main Methods:

Utilized Archerfish as a model organism for studying magnitude perception.
Trained fish to interact with artificial targets on a screen above a water tank.
Assessed performance in spontaneous, untrained two-choice magnitude decision tasks.

Main Results:

Archerfish favored groups with larger non-numerical magnitudes and fewer dots.
Selection of groups with more dots occurred primarily when numerical quantity correlated with all non-numerical magnitudes.
Demonstrated a significant influence of non-numerical magnitudes on decision-making.

Conclusions:

Archerfish decisions are more influenced by non-numerical magnitudes than numerical quantity in certain contexts.
Findings question the universal primacy of numerical quantity perception in magnitude-based decision-making.
Provides evidence for the role of non-numerical factors in cognitive processes related to quantity.