Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 26, 2025

Three Differential Expression Analysis Methods for RNA Sequencing: limma, EdgeR, DESeq2
Published on: September 18, 2021
Effect of high variation in transcript expression on identifying differentially expressed genes in RNA-seq analysis
Weitong Cui1, Huaru Xue1, Yifan Geng1,2
1Key Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering & Technology of Shandong High School, Qilu Medical University, Zibo, P. R. China.
Stringent thresholds do not improve differential expression analysis reliability in RNA-seq data. Less stringent cutoffs and larger sample sizes are recommended for more reproducible identification of differentially expressed genes (DEGs).
Area of Science:
- Genomics and Bioinformatics
- Cancer Research
- Transcriptomics
Background:
- RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) is crucial for differential expression (DE) analysis.
- Establishing appropriate thresholds for fold change and adjusted p-value in DE gene (DEG) identification remains challenging.
- Current consensus often favors stringent thresholds for enhanced reliability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of adjusted p-value and fold change thresholds on DE analysis reproducibility.
- To evaluate the influence of sample size on DEG identification reliability using RNA-seq data.
- To provide recommendations for optimal DEG screening in RNA-seq studies.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of RNA-seq data from three cancer types in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database.
- Systematic evaluation of varying adjusted p-value and fold change thresholds.
- Assessment of DEG overlap rates across different sample sizes and threshold stringencies.
- Raw read count analysis to examine transcript expression variability.
Main Results:
- More stringent thresholds led to poorer reproducibility of DE results for a given sample size.
- Smaller sample sizes exhibited lower overlap rates of DEGs compared to larger sample sizes, irrespective of threshold.
- High transcript expression variability within and between sample groups caused significant fluctuations in fold change and adjusted p-values.
Conclusions:
- Stringent thresholds do not guarantee more reliable DEGs due to inherent transcript expression variations.
- DEG identification reliability is particularly susceptible to expression variability in small sample sizes.
- Less stringent thresholds and larger sample sizes are recommended for robust DEG screening in RNA-seq experiments.
More Related Videos
12:44Identification of Key Factors Regulating Self-renewal and Differentiation in EML Hematopoietic Precursor Cells by RNA-sequencing Analysis
Published on: November 11, 2014
07:29Characterization of In Vitro Differentiation of Human Primary Keratinocytes by RNA-Seq Analysis
Published on: May 16, 2020
Related Concept Videos
RNA-seq
Before the discovery of RNA-seq, microarray-based methods and Sanger sequencing were used for transcriptome analysis. However, while...
Ribosome Profiling
Applications of ribosome profiling
Ribosome profiling has many applications, including in vivo monitoring of translation inside a particular organ or tissue type and quantifying new protein synthesis levels.
The technique...
What is Gene Expression?
Regulation of Expression at Multiple Steps