Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 25, 2025

Characterizing Exon Skipping Efficiency in DMD Patient Samples in Clinical Trials of Antisense Oligonucleotides
Published on: May 7, 2020
MET D1228N and D1246N are the Same Resistance Mutation in MET Exon 14 Skipping
Jonathan M Tsai1, Aaron N Hata2, Jochen K Lennerz3
1Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract:
Comprehensive genetic profiling using next-generation sequencing technologies has become an integral part of precision oncology. Variant annotation requires translating the DNA findings into protein level predictions. In this article we highlight inconsistencies in variant annotation for the MET D1228N exon 19 resistance mutations. MET D1228N and D1246N represent the same resistance mutation in MET exon 14 skipping alterations annotated on different transcripts. Additional examples of relevant variants annotated on different transcripts emphasize the importance of avoiding erroneous interpretation when realizing precision oncology.
Insights
Next-generation sequencing in precision oncology faces challenges. Inconsistent variant annotation, like for MET exon 14 skipping mutations, can lead to misinterpretations affecting patient treatment.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Genetics
- Bioinformatics
Background:
- Precision oncology relies on comprehensive genetic profiling using next-generation sequencing (NGS).
- Accurate variant annotation is crucial for translating DNA alterations into actionable protein-level predictions.
- The MET gene is frequently implicated in various cancers, with specific mutations conferring therapeutic resistance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To highlight inconsistencies in variant annotation for MET resistance mutations, specifically focusing on exon 19 alterations.
- To demonstrate how the same resistance mutation can be annotated differently based on transcript variations.
- To emphasize the critical need for standardized and accurate variant annotation in precision oncology.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of genetic variant data from next-generation sequencing.
- Comparison of variant annotations across different MET gene transcripts.
- Identification and exemplification of annotation discrepancies for MET D1228N and D1246N mutations.
Main Results:
- Identified inconsistencies in the annotation of MET D1228N and D1246N resistance mutations.
- Demonstrated that these represent the same resistance mutation within MET exon 14 skipping alterations but are annotated on different transcripts.
- Provided additional examples of variants with similar annotation issues across different transcripts.
Conclusions:
- Inconsistent variant annotation poses a significant risk of erroneous interpretation in precision oncology.
- Standardization of annotation practices is essential to ensure the reliable application of genetic profiling in cancer treatment.
- Addressing these annotation discrepancies is vital for the effective implementation of precision medicine strategies.
More Related Videos
10:57Visualizing Genetic Variants, Short Targets, and Point Mutations in the Morphological Tissue Context with an RNA In Situ Hybridization Assay
Published on: August 14, 2018
09:58Using RNA-sequencing to Detect Novel Splice Variants Related to Drug Resistance in In Vitro Cancer Models
Published on: December 9, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Mismatch Repair
The Mutator Protein Family Plays a Key Role in DNA Mismatch Repair
The human genome has more than 3 billion base pairs of DNA per cell. Prior to cell division, that vast amount of genetic...
Mismatch Repair