Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 25, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing 3D Modeling for Enhanced Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Nodules in Early-Stage Lung Cancer
Published on: October 13, 2023
Deep Learning Systems for Pneumothorax Detection on Chest Radiographs: A Multicenter External Validation Study
Yee Liang Thian1, Dianwen Ng1, James Thomas Patrick Decourcy Hallinan1
1Department of Diagnostic Imaging, National University Hospital, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore 119074 (Y.L.T., D.N., J.T.P.D.H., P.J., S.Y.S., V.T.Y.T., S.T.Q.); Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, School of Computer Science, and Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore (D.N., M.F.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Alexandra Hospital, Singapore (J.T.P.D.H.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore (C.H.T., Y.H.T.); Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (C.H.T.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore (P.L.K.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore (G.G.P.).
Purpose:
To assess the generalizability of a deep learning pneumothorax detection model on datasets from multiple external institutions and examine patient and acquisition factors that might influence performance.
Materials And Methods:
In this retrospective study, a deep learning model was trained for pneumothorax detection by merging two large open-source chest radiograph datasets: ChestX-ray14 and CheXpert. It was then tested on six external datasets from multiple independent institutions (labeled A-F) in a retrospective case-control design (data acquired between 2016 and 2019 from institutions A-E; institution F consisted of data from the MIMIC-CXR dataset). Performance on each dataset was evaluated by using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values, with two radiologists in consensus being used as the reference standard. Patient and acquisition factors that influenced performance were analyzed.
Results:
The AUCs for pneumothorax detection for external institutions A-F were 0.91 (95% CI: 0.88, 0.94), 0.97 (95% CI: 0.94, 0.99), 0.91 (95% CI: 0.85, 0.97), 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96, 1.0), 0.97 (95% CI: 0.95, 0.99), and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.90, 0.95), respectively, compared with the internal test AUC of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.92, 0.93). The model had lower performance for small compared with large pneumothoraces (AUC, 0.88 [95% CI: 0.85, 0.91] vs AUC, 0.96 [95% CI: 0.95, 0.97]; P = .005). Model performance was not different when a chest tube was present or absent on the radiographs (AUC, 0.95 [95% CI: 0.92, 0.97] vs AUC, 0.94 [95% CI: 0.92, 0.05]; P > .99).
Conclusion:
A deep learning model trained with a large volume of data on the task of pneumothorax detection was able to generalize well to multiple external datasets with patient demographics and technical parameters independent of the training data.Keywords: Thorax, Computer Applications-Detection/DiagnosisSee also commentary by Jacobson and Krupinski in this issue.Supplemental material is available for this article.©RSNA, 2021.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Pneumothorax-II
Clinical Manifestations:
Pneumothorax-I
Pneumothorax can be even further classified as spontaneous, traumatic, and tension pneumothorax.

