Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 25, 2025

External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?
Published on: June 6, 2020
A Multivariable Predictive Model for Success of External Cephalic Version
Carly M Dahl1, Yue Zhang, Janice X Ong
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Biostatistics, and the Department of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, and the Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago Illinois; and the Section of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven Connecticut.
Objective:
To create a prediction model for external cephalic version (ECV) success using objective patient characteristics.
Methods:
This retrospective study included pregnant individuals of at least 18 years of age with a nonanomalous, singleton gestation who underwent an ECV attempt between 2006 and 2016 at a single quaternary care hospital. Variables assessed included maternal age, height, weight, body mass index (BMI), parity, fetal sex, gestational age, estimated fetal weight, type of fetal malpresentation, placental location, and amniotic fluid volume. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine the association of patient characteristics with ECV success. Estimated odds ratios and corresponding 95% CIs were calculated for each variable, and backward elimination and bootstrapping were used to find a parsimonious model for ECV success with the highest discriminatory capacity (as determined by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC]). This model was evaluated with a calibration curve across deciles of success.
Results:
A total of 1,138 individuals underwent an ECV attempt and were included in this analysis. The overall ECV success frequency was 40.6%. Factors significantly associated with ECV success were maternal age, parity, placental location, estimated fetal weight, and type of fetal malpresentation. A final model with BMI, parity, placental location, and type of fetal malpresentation had the highest AUC (0.667 [95% CI 0.634-0.701]), resulted in good calibration, and is represented by the following equation: 1/[1+e-x] where x=1.1726-0.0314 (BMI)-0.9299 (nulliparity)+1.0218 (transverse or oblique presentation at ECV)-0.5113 (anterior placenta). An interactive version of this equation was created and can be accessed at www.ecvcalculator.com.
Conclusion:
A prediction model that estimates the probability of ECV success was created and internally validated. This model incorporates easily obtainable and objective patient factors known before ECV and may be used in decision making and patient counseling about ECV.
Related Concept Videos
Predicting Reaction Outcomes
Variation
When independent and dependent variables are plotted on a scatter plot, the slope of a line is a value that describes the rate of change between the two...
Multicompartment Models: Overview
These models offer a more comprehensive representation of drug behavior in the body than one-compartment models. They accommodate the complexity of drug distribution,...
Multiple Regression
Farmers can use multiple regression to determine the crop yield based on more than one factor, such as water availability, fertilizer, soil properties, etc. Here, the crop yield is the response or dependent variable as it depends on the other independent variables. The analysis requires the construction of a scatter plot...
Survival Tree
Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...
Improving Translational Accuracy

