Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 25, 2025

Robotic Left Hepatectomy using Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging for an Intrahepatic Complex Biliary Cyst
Published on: June 24, 2022
Robotic donor hepatectomy: Are we there yet?
Ashwin Rammohan1, Mohamed Rela2
1Institute of Liver Disease & Transplantation, Dr. Rela Institute & Medical Centre, Bharath Institute of Higher Education & Research, Chennai 600044, India. ashwinrammohan@gmail.com.
Minimally invasive donor hepatectomy (MIDH) using robotic surgical systems offers a safer alternative to open surgery in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). This approach aims to reduce donor morbidity and improve outcomes, though standardization and learning curves require further investigation.
Area of Science:
- Surgical Innovation
- Transplantation Surgery
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
Background:
- Donor safety is critical in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).
- Conventional open donor hepatectomy (DH) has high morbidity rates (25%-40%), with wound complications and scarring being significant donor concerns.
- Laparoscopic DH presents technical challenges and a steep learning curve, hindering widespread adoption of minimally invasive donor hepatectomy (MIDH).
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the evolution of minimally invasive donor hepatectomy (MIDH).
- To highlight the current status of robotic donor hepatectomy (RDH).
- To discuss existing challenges and the future role of robotic DH in LDLT.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature on minimally invasive donor hepatectomy (MIDH).
- Analysis of the advantages of robotic surgical systems over conventional laparoscopy for DH.
- Discussion of challenges related to standardization, outcomes, and learning curves in robotic DH.
Main Results:
- Robotic surgical systems enhance visualization and dexterity, potentially overcoming limitations of laparoscopic surgery.
- Robotic DH facilitates a smoother transition from technical feasibility to reproducibility compared to laparoscopy.
- Despite advancements, critical questions regarding standardization, comparative outcomes, and learning curves for robotic DH persist.
Conclusions:
- Robotic DH represents a promising advancement in MIDH, potentially improving donor safety and reducing complications.
- Further research is needed to address standardization, establish clear outcome comparisons, and define the learning curve for robotic DH.
- Robotic technology is poised to play an increasingly important role in the future of LDLT programs.

