Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 25, 2025

Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
Clinical Phenotype Classification of Atrial Fibrillation Patients Using Cluster Analysis and Associations with
Marco Vitolo1,2,3, Marco Proietti1,4,5, Alena Shantsila1
1Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool and Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, Liverpool L7 8TX, UK.
Insights
Atrial fibrillation (AF) patient heterogeneity necessitates a phenotype-driven approach. Cluster analysis revealed four distinct AF patient groups with unique characteristics and outcomes, highlighting the need for personalized management strategies to improve patient health.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Clinical Research
- Data Science
Background:
- Atrial fibrillation (AF) patient populations exhibit significant clinical heterogeneity.
- Conventional classification methods may not fully capture this diversity.
- Identifying distinct patient phenotypes is crucial for effective management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify distinct clinical phenotypes within the atrial fibrillation (AF) patient population using cluster analysis.
- To evaluate the association between identified AF patient clusters and key clinical outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Hierarchical cluster analysis was performed on 3980 AF patients from the AMADEUS and BOREALIS trials.
- Patients were treated with Vitamin-K Antagonist.
- Primary outcome: composite of stroke/thromboembolism, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and all-cause death. Secondary outcomes included major bleeding.
Main Results:
- Four distinct AF patient clusters were identified based on clinical characteristics and comorbidities.
- Cluster 4, characterized by the highest burden of non-cardiovascular comorbidities, exhibited the highest cumulative risk of adverse outcomes.
- Compared to Cluster 1 (low comorbidity burden), Cluster 4 showed significantly increased risks for the composite outcome, all-cause death, and major bleeding.
Conclusions:
- Cluster analysis successfully identified four clinically relevant AF patient phenotypes.
- These phenotypes possess unique characteristics and are associated with differential clinical outcomes.
- A phenotype-driven management approach for AF patients is warranted to address heterogeneity and improve outcomes.
Background And Purpose:
Given the great clinical heterogeneity of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients, conventional classification only based on disease subtype or arrhythmia patterns may not adequately characterize this population. We aimed to identify different groups of AF patients who shared common clinical phenotypes using cluster analysis and evaluate the association between identified clusters and clinical outcomes.
Methods:
We performed a hierarchical cluster analysis in AF patients from AMADEUS and BOREALIS trials. The primary outcome was a composite of stroke/thromboembolism (TE), cardiovascular (CV) death, myocardial infarction, and/or all-cause death. Individual components of the primary outcome and major bleeding were also assessed.
Results:
We included 3980 AF patients treated with the Vitamin-K Antagonist from the AMADEUS and BOREALIS studies. The analysis identified four clusters in which patients varied significantly among clinical characteristics. Cluster 1 was characterized by patients with low rates of CV risk factors and comorbidities; Cluster 2 was characterized by patients with a high burden of CV risk factors; Cluster 3 consisted of patients with a high burden of CV comorbidities; Cluster 4 was characterized by the highest rates of non-CV comorbidities. After a mean follow-up of 365 (standard deviation 187) days, Cluster 4 had the highest cumulative risk of outcomes. Compared with Cluster 1, Cluster 4 was independently associated with an increased risk for the composite outcome (hazard ratio (HR) 2.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.70-3.46), all-cause death (HR 2.35, 95% CI 1.58-3.49) and major bleeding (HR 2.18, 95% CI 1.19-3.96).
Conclusions:
Cluster analysis identified four different clinically relevant phenotypes of AF patients that had unique clinical characteristics and different outcomes. Cluster analysis highlights the high degree of heterogeneity in patients with AF, suggesting the need for a phenotype-driven approach to comorbidities, which could provide a more holistic approach to management aimed to improve patients' outcomes.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias II: Atrial, Junctional and Ventricular Arrhythmias
Dysrhythmias II: Classification of Tachyarrhythmias
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Dysrhythmias V: Evaluating Dysrhythmias
Cardiomyopathy I: Introduction and Classification

