Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Intratumoral Injection of Cisplatin for the Treatment of Isolated Mediastinal Recurrence of Lung Cancer
Published on: February 12, 2017
E2112: Randomized Phase III Trial of Endocrine Therapy Plus Entinostat or Placebo in Hormone Receptor-Positive
Roisin M Connolly1,2, Fengmin Zhao3, Kathy D Miller4
1The Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD.
Purpose:
Endocrine therapy resistance in advanced breast cancer remains a significant clinical problem that may be overcome with the use of histone deacetylase inhibitors such as entinostat. The ENCORE301 phase II study reported improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with the addition of entinostat to the steroidal aromatase inhibitor (AI) exemestane in advanced hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer.
Patients And Methods:
E2112 is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study that enrolled men or women with advanced HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer whose disease progressed after nonsteroidal AI. Participants were randomly assigned to exemestane 25 mg by mouth once daily and entinostat (EE) or placebo (EP) 5 mg by mouth once weekly. Primary end points were PFS by central review and OS. Secondary end points included safety, objective response rate, and lysine acetylation change in peripheral blood mononuclear cells between baseline and cycle 1 day 15.
Results:
Six hundred eight patients were randomly assigned during March 2014-October 2018. Median age was 63 years (range 29-91), 60% had visceral disease, and 84% had progressed after nonsteroidal AI in metastatic setting. Previous treatments included chemotherapy (60%), fulvestrant (30%), and cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor (35%). Most common grade 3 and 4 adverse events in the EE arm included neutropenia (20%), hypophosphatemia (14%), anemia (8%), leukopenia (6%), fatigue (4%), diarrhea (4%), and thrombocytopenia (3%). Median PFS was 3.3 months (EE) versus 3.1 months (EP; hazard ratio = 0.87; 95% CI, 0.67 to 1.13; P = .30). Median OS was 23.4 months (EE) versus 21.7 months (EP; hazard ratio = 0.99; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.21; P = .94). Objective response rate was 5.8% (EE) and 5.6% (EP). Pharmacodynamic analysis confirmed target inhibition in entinostat-treated patients.
Conclusion:
The combination of exemestane and entinostat did not improve survival in AI-resistant advanced HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.
Insights
Adding entinostat to exemestane did not improve survival for patients with advanced hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer resistant to endocrine therapy. Further research is needed for this patient population.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Endocrine therapy resistance is a major challenge in advanced breast cancer treatment.
- Histone deacetylase inhibitors, like entinostat, are being investigated to overcome this resistance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of combining entinostat with exemestane in patients with advanced hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer.
- To assess the impact on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with aromatase inhibitor-resistant disease.
Main Methods:
- A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study (E2112) enrolled patients with advanced HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer progressing after nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors (AIs).
- Participants received either exemestane plus entinostat (EE) or exemestane plus placebo (EP).
- Primary endpoints were PFS and OS, with safety and pharmacodynamic analyses as secondary endpoints.
Main Results:
- The study enrolled 608 patients, with a median age of 63. Most patients had visceral disease and had progressed after prior AI treatment.
- Median PFS was 3.3 months for EE versus 3.1 months for EP (hazard ratio = 0.87; P = .30).
- Median OS was 23.4 months for EE versus 21.7 months for EP (hazard ratio = 0.99; P = .94). Common grade 3/4 adverse events in the EE arm included neutropenia and hypophosphatemia.
Conclusions:
- The combination of exemestane and entinostat did not significantly improve PFS or OS in patients with AI-resistant advanced HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.
- The safety profile of the combination was consistent with known toxicities, with neutropenia being a notable adverse event.
More Related Videos
09:48An Orthotopic Endometrial Cancer Model with Retroperitoneal Lymphadenopathy Made From In Vivo Propagated and Cultured VX2 Cells
Published on: September 12, 2019
03:07Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial
Published on: August 19, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Mitogens and the Cell Cycle
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Treatment Resistent Cancers
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Cancer Survival Analysis