Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

High-speed, scanned laser structuring of multi-layered eco/bioresorbable materials for advanced electronic systems.

Nature communications·2022
Same author

Wearable Sensors Improve Prediction of Post-Stroke Walking Function Following Inpatient Rehabilitation.

IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine·2022
Same author

Translational gaps and opportunities for medical wearables in digital health.

Science translational medicine·2022
Same author

Materials and devices for immersive virtual reality.

Nature reviews. Materials·2022
Same author

The distribution of acquired peripheral nerve injuries associated with severe COVID-19 implicate a mechanism of entrapment neuropathy: a multicenter case series and clinical feasibility study of a wearable, wireless pressure sensor.

Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation·2022
Same author

Challenges and opportunities in flexible, stretchable and morphable bio-interfaced technologies.

National science review·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 25, 2025

Bridging the Bio-Electronic Interface with Biofabrication
16:38

Bridging the Bio-Electronic Interface with Biofabrication

Published on: June 6, 2012

17.0K

Three dimensional bioelectronic interfaces to small-scale biological systems.

Yoonseok Park1, Ted S Chung2, John A Rogers3

  • 1Querrey Simpson Institute for Bioelectronics, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA.

Current Opinion in Biotechnology
|August 6, 2021
PubMed
Summary

New bioelectronic interfaces offer advanced ways to study and control 3D biological constructs like organoids. These technologies, including scaffolds and frameworks, provide better volumetric and surface interaction than traditional methods.

More Related Videos

Bidirectional Electrical and Optoelectronic Interfaces in Healthy and Ischemic Ex Vivo Rat Hearts
08:33

Bidirectional Electrical and Optoelectronic Interfaces in Healthy and Ischemic Ex Vivo Rat Hearts

Published on: July 18, 2025

478
Chip-based Three-dimensional Cell Culture in Perfused Micro-bioreactors
12:39

Chip-based Three-dimensional Cell Culture in Perfused Micro-bioreactors

Published on: May 21, 2008

11.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 25, 2025

Bridging the Bio-Electronic Interface with Biofabrication
16:38

Bridging the Bio-Electronic Interface with Biofabrication

Published on: June 6, 2012

17.0K
Bidirectional Electrical and Optoelectronic Interfaces in Healthy and Ischemic Ex Vivo Rat Hearts
08:33

Bidirectional Electrical and Optoelectronic Interfaces in Healthy and Ischemic Ex Vivo Rat Hearts

Published on: July 18, 2025

478
Chip-based Three-dimensional Cell Culture in Perfused Micro-bioreactors
12:39

Chip-based Three-dimensional Cell Culture in Perfused Micro-bioreactors

Published on: May 21, 2008

11.7K

Area of Science:

  • Bioelectronics
  • Tissue Engineering
  • Biotechnology

Background:

  • Recent breakthroughs in bio-interface technologies provide diverse electronic, optoelectronic, thermal, and chemical tools.
  • These advanced methods enable precise probing and modulation of small-scale three dimensional (3D) biological constructs, such as organoids, spheroids, and assembloids.
  • Current technologies offer significant advantages over traditional methods by extending into volumetric spaces and conforming to curved tissue surfaces.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review recent advancements in bio-interface technologies for 3D biological constructs.
  • To highlight the effectiveness of various design strategies, including thin deformable sheets, filamentary penetrating pins, open mesh structures, and 3D interconnected networks.
  • To emphasize multimodal interfaces, specifically tissue-embedding scaffolds and tissue-surrounding frameworks.

Main Methods:

  • Review of recent literature on bio-interface technologies.
  • Analysis of design strategies for probing and modulating 3D biological constructs.
  • Focus on multimodal interfaces like scaffolds and frameworks.

Main Results:

  • Emergence of diverse bio-interface options (electronic, optoelectronic, thermal, chemical).
  • Development of effective design strategies: deformable sheets, penetrating pins, mesh structures, 3D networks.
  • Emphasis on tissue-embedding scaffolds and tissue-surrounding frameworks as key multimodal interfaces.

Conclusions:

  • Bio-interface technologies represent a significant advancement for studying 3D biological constructs.
  • The reviewed design strategies offer enhanced volumetric and surface interaction capabilities.
  • Multimodal interfaces, particularly scaffolds and frameworks, are crucial for future bioelectronic applications.