Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Enhancing microplastic monitoring with ships of opportunity to determine baselines: Methodological design matters.

Marine pollution bulletin·2026
Same author

A spoonful of sugar: human exposure to microplastics through consumption of processed sugarcane.

Food additives & contaminants. Part A, Chemistry, analysis, control, exposure & risk assessment·2026
Same author

Occurrence and profiles of benzotriazole UV stabilizers in bird feathers from polar regions and China.

Environmental research·2026
Same author

Communicating Confidence in the Reliability of Micro- and Nanoplastic Identification in Human Health Studies.

Environment & health (Washington, D.C.)·2026
Same author

PFAS Toxicity: What's True, What's Not, and What Really Matters.

Environmental science & technology·2026
Same author

Extractable organofluorine (EOF) and target PFAS, including trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), in human serum from a Norwegian cohort, with a case study on the impact of fluorinated pharmaceuticals.

Environment international·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 25, 2025

Multimodal Analysis of Microplastics in Drinking Water using a Silicon Nanomembrane Analysis Pipeline
09:10

Multimodal Analysis of Microplastics in Drinking Water using a Silicon Nanomembrane Analysis Pipeline

Published on: June 13, 2025

803

Moving forward in microplastic research: A Norwegian perspective.

Amy L Lusher1, Rachel Hurley2, Hans Peter H Arp3

  • 1Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA), Gaustadalléen 21, NO-0349 Oslo, Norway; Department of Biological Sciences, University of Bergen, NO-5020 Bergen, Norway.

Environment International
|August 6, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Addressing microplastic pollution requires coordinated research and collaboration between scientists, policymakers, and the public. This Norwegian perspective highlights synergistic efforts to share knowledge and develop effective solutions for environmental protection.

Keywords:
MicroplasticMonitoringNanoplasticPlasticRisk assessmentSources

More Related Videos

Protocol for Microplastics Sampling on the Sea Surface and Sample Analysis
10:16

Protocol for Microplastics Sampling on the Sea Surface and Sample Analysis

Published on: December 16, 2016

50.2K
Separation and Identification of Conventional Microplastics from Farmland Soils
14:10

Separation and Identification of Conventional Microplastics from Farmland Soils

Published on: March 21, 2025

2.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 25, 2025

Multimodal Analysis of Microplastics in Drinking Water using a Silicon Nanomembrane Analysis Pipeline
09:10

Multimodal Analysis of Microplastics in Drinking Water using a Silicon Nanomembrane Analysis Pipeline

Published on: June 13, 2025

803
Protocol for Microplastics Sampling on the Sea Surface and Sample Analysis
10:16

Protocol for Microplastics Sampling on the Sea Surface and Sample Analysis

Published on: December 16, 2016

50.2K
Separation and Identification of Conventional Microplastics from Farmland Soils
14:10

Separation and Identification of Conventional Microplastics from Farmland Soils

Published on: March 21, 2025

2.3K

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Science
  • Environmental Policy
  • Materials Science

Background:

  • Microplastics pose increasing environmental threats, necessitating a shift from basic research to applied science for mitigation.
  • Effective solutions require evidence-based decision-making, clear communication, and collaboration among diverse stakeholders.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a Norwegian perspective on the current state of knowledge regarding microplastic research.
  • To emphasize the importance of cross-sectoral collaboration in addressing plastic pollution.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing microplastic research efforts in Norway.
  • Analysis of collaborative strategies between researchers, policymakers, and environmental authorities.
  • Identification of knowledge gaps and targeted measures for microplastic mitigation.

Main Results:

  • Cross-sectoral collaboration in Norway has been crucial for developing a national strategy against plastic pollution.
  • Synergistic efforts facilitate knowledge exchange, gap identification, and the implementation of feasible measures.
  • Norway's international involvement serves as a model for collaborative action against plastic pollution.

Conclusions:

  • Effective microplastic management hinges on interdisciplinary research and strong partnerships between science, policy, and the public.
  • Harmonized research and clear communication are vital for developing effective, scalable solutions.
  • Collaborative approaches are essential for establishing and updating action plans to combat microplastic pollution holistically.