Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Multicellular Coordinated Network Driving Lymphovascular Space Invasion in Endometrioid Endometrial Carcinoma.

Cell proliferation·2026
Same author

Drug Combination Recommendation Model for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Antiphospholipid Syndrome.

Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Video Abnormal Behavior Recognition and Trajectory Prediction Based on Lightweight Skeleton Feature Extraction.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same author

Unsupervised Feature-Construction-Based Motor Fault Diagnosis.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same author

A Mood Semantic Awareness Model for Emotional Interactive Robots.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same author

EEG and ECG-Based Multi-Sensor Fusion Computing for Real-Time Fatigue Driving Recognition Based on Feedback Mechanism.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 25, 2025

DNA Methylation: Bisulphite Modification and Analysis
12:34

DNA Methylation: Bisulphite Modification and Analysis

Published on: October 21, 2011

105.6K

Comprehensive Evaluation of Differential Methylation Analysis Methods for Bisulfite Sequencing Data.

Yongjun Piao1,2, Wanxue Xu3, Kwang Ho Park4

  • 1School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China.

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
|August 7, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Evaluating DNA methylation analysis methods for bisulfite sequencing (BS-seq) reveals significant differences. No single method excels universally, and limited replicates pose greater challenges than low sequencing depth.

Keywords:
BS-seqDNA methylationdifferentially methylated regions

More Related Videos

Enhanced Reduced Representation Bisulfite Sequencing for Assessment of DNA Methylation at Base Pair Resolution
13:47

Enhanced Reduced Representation Bisulfite Sequencing for Assessment of DNA Methylation at Base Pair Resolution

Published on: February 24, 2015

25.8K
Optimized Analysis of DNA Methylation and Gene Expression from Small, Anatomically-defined Areas of the Brain
13:11

Optimized Analysis of DNA Methylation and Gene Expression from Small, Anatomically-defined Areas of the Brain

Published on: July 12, 2012

19.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 25, 2025

DNA Methylation: Bisulphite Modification and Analysis
12:34

DNA Methylation: Bisulphite Modification and Analysis

Published on: October 21, 2011

105.6K
Enhanced Reduced Representation Bisulfite Sequencing for Assessment of DNA Methylation at Base Pair Resolution
13:47

Enhanced Reduced Representation Bisulfite Sequencing for Assessment of DNA Methylation at Base Pair Resolution

Published on: February 24, 2015

25.8K
Optimized Analysis of DNA Methylation and Gene Expression from Small, Anatomically-defined Areas of the Brain
13:11

Optimized Analysis of DNA Methylation and Gene Expression from Small, Anatomically-defined Areas of the Brain

Published on: July 12, 2012

19.0K

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Epigenetics

Background:

  • Next-generation sequencing enables genome-wide DNA methylation quantification at single-base resolution.
  • Bisulfite sequencing (BS-seq) is the predominant technique for this analysis.
  • Numerous computational methods exist for identifying differentially methylated regions in BS-seq data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To comprehensively evaluate commonly used differential methylation analysis methods for BS-seq data.
  • To identify the strengths and limitations of each evaluated method.
  • To provide guidance for data analysis and interpretation.

Main Methods:

  • Benchmarking of various differential methylation analysis methods.
  • Assessment of method performance based on key metrics.
  • Analysis of the impact of replicates and sequencing depth on computational analysis.

Main Results:

  • Significant performance differences were observed among the evaluated methods.
  • No single method consistently outperformed others across all benchmarks.
  • Limited biological replicates presented greater computational challenges than low sequencing depth.
  • Smoothing techniques did not substantially improve method performance.

Conclusions:

  • Differential methylation analysis of BS-seq data requires careful consideration of method choice.
  • Method selection should account for the specific characteristics of the dataset, including replicate number and sequencing depth.
  • Researchers should exercise caution during data analysis and interpretation, particularly with limited replicates or sequencing depth.