Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2026

Measuring DNA Damage and Repair in Mouse Splenocytes After Chronic In Vivo Exposure to Very Low Doses of Beta- and Gamma-Radiation
Published on: July 3, 2015
Sister chromatid induction by beta-irradiation from incorporated 3H-thymidine: a paradox explained
D J Roberts1, G R White, C H Ockey
1Paterson Institute for Cancer Research, Christie Hospital, Manchester, England.
Abstract:
Sister chromatid exchanges (SCE's) induced by [3H]thymidine (3HdT) of increasing specific activities incorporated over one cycle and 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd) over the two following cycles were investigated in synchronised Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. SCEs induced during the first cycle on a T.T template (SCE 1) show little increase with dose compared with those induced in the second cycle on a 3HT.T template (SCE 2) where the linear increase with dose reflects that seen after X irradiation. During the third cycle, SCEs 3.1 and 3.2 are induced on unlabelled T.B or labelled 3HT.B templates respectively. These templates are theoretically present in a 1:1 ratio after random segregation at second metaphase. Over practically the entire dose range however, the ratio 3.1/3.2, which decreased with dose, was greater than 1.0 and similar to the high values obtained by other workers. At increasing times after BrdUrd introduction, the ratio decreased from greater than 1.0 to less than 1.0. Measurements showed that the expected 50% level of labelled chromosomes at metaphase in the samples could vary between 42%-59%. Cells with greater than 50% labelled chromosomes were more delayed in the cell cycle due to the 3H-irradiation than those with less than 50%. Early fixations therefore favoured SCE 3.1 while late favoured SCE 3.2. SCEs due to BrdUrd in 3HT.B and T.B templates showed no synergistic interaction with irradiation-induced SCEs. When these BrdUrd-induced SCEs were removed from the totals then the 3H-induced SCE levels in 3HT.T, and 3HT.B templates (SCE 2 and 3.2) were similar and increased at a similar rate with dose. This was 2-3 times faster than in SCE 1 and 3.1 where the SCE levels due to irradiation were again similar but lower than for 2 and 3.2.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
More Related Videos
08:18Application of Laser Micro-irradiation for Examination of Single and Double Strand Break Repair in Mammalian Cells
Published on: September 5, 2017
06:44Assessment of Global DNA Double-Strand End Resection using BrdU-DNA Labeling coupled with Cell Cycle Discrimination Imaging
Published on: April 28, 2021
Related Concept Videos
DNA Damage can Stall the Cell Cycle
Homologous Recombination
Restarting Stalled Replication Forks
Mutations
Chromosomal Alterations Are Large-Scale Mutations
While point mutations are changes in a single nucleotide in...
DNA Damage Can Stall the Cell Cycle
Spontaneous and Induced Mutations