Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 25, 2025

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
An Overview of Phase 2 Clinical Trial Designs
Pedro A Torres-Saavedra1, Kathryn A Winter1
1NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Abstract:
Clinical trials are studies to test new treatments in humans. Typically, these treatments are evaluated over several phases to assess their safety and efficacy. Phase 1 trials are designed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of a new treatment, typically with a small number of patients (eg, 20-80), generally spread across several dose levels. Phase 2 trials are designed to determine whether the new treatment has sufficiently promising efficacy to warrant further investigation in a large-scale randomized phase 3 trial, as well as to further assess safety. These studies usually involve a few hundred patients. This article provides an overview of some of the most commonly used phase 2 designs for clinical trials and emphasizes their critical elements and considerations. Key references to some of the most commonly used phase 2 designs are given to allow the reader to explore in more detail the critical aspects when planning a phase 2 trial. A comparison of 3 potential designs in the context of the NRG-HN002 trial is presented to complement the discussion about phase 2 trials.
Insights
This article reviews common phase 2 clinical trial designs, focusing on their critical elements for assessing new treatment efficacy and safety in patients. It highlights considerations for planning these essential early-stage drug development studies.
Area of Science:
- Clinical pharmacology and drug development
- Biostatistics and clinical trial design
Background:
- Clinical trials evaluate new human treatments in phases to assess safety and efficacy.
- Phase 1 trials assess safety and tolerability in small patient groups (20-80) across dose levels.
- Phase 2 trials determine promising efficacy for larger studies and further assess safety in hundreds of patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide an overview of commonly used phase 2 clinical trial designs.
- To emphasize critical elements and considerations for planning phase 2 trials.
- To compare three potential phase 2 designs using the NRG-HN002 trial as a case study.
Main Methods:
- Review of commonly utilized phase 2 clinical trial designs.
- Discussion of critical elements and considerations in phase 2 trial planning.
- Comparative analysis of three distinct phase 2 designs within the NRG-HN002 trial context.
Main Results:
- Identifies and describes prevalent phase 2 clinical trial methodologies.
- Outlines essential factors for successful phase 2 trial design and execution.
- Illustrates practical application and comparison of phase 2 designs through a specific trial example.
Conclusions:
- Understanding phase 2 trial designs is crucial for advancing new treatments.
- Careful consideration of design elements ensures efficient and informative early-stage drug evaluation.
- The presented comparison aids in selecting appropriate phase 2 designs for future clinical research.
More Related Videos
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
08:36Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
Published on: April 19, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Preclinical Development: Overview
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.