Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 25, 2025

Digital Home-Monitoring of Patients after Kidney Transplantation: The MACCS Platform
Published on: April 12, 2021
Cost-effectiveness of a telemonitoring program (telEPOC program) in frequently admitted chronic obstructive pulmonary
Cristóbal Esteban1,2,3, Ane Antón2,4,5, Javier Moraza1,3
1Servicio de Neumología, 16250Hospital Galdakao, Spain.
Abstract:
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is a typical disease among chronic and respiratory diseases. The costs associated with chronic disease care are rising dramatically, and this makes it necessary to redesign care processes, including new tools which allow the health system to be more sustainable without compromising on the quality of the care, compared to that currently provided. One approach may be to use information and communication technologies. In this context, we explored the cost-effectiveness of applying a telemonitoring system to a cohort of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with frequent readmissions (the telEPOC programme). We conducted an intervention study with a control group. The inclusion criteria used were having chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (forced expiratory volume in the first second/forced vital capacity < 70%) and having been hospitalised for exacerbation at least twice in the last year or three times in the last 2 years. We estimated the costs incurred by patients in each group and calculated the quality-adjusted life years and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Overall, 77 patients were included in the control group and 86 in the intervention group. The raw cost-effectiveness analysis showed that the cost of the telEPOC intervention was significantly lower than that of usual care, while there were no significant differences between the groups in effectiveness. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for the intervention was €175,719.71 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. There were no differences between the intervention group (telemonitoring) and the control group (standard care) from the cost-effectiveness point of view. On the other hand, the intervention programme (telEPOC) was less expensive than routine clinical practice.
Related Concept Videos
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-V: Nursing Management
Assessment
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-V: Management
Smoking Cessation
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-IV: Assessement and Diagnostic Studies
Medical History
COPD: Management Using Bronchodilators and Corticosteroids
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-I: Introduction
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Smoking is a primary risk factor for COPD, with over 80% of patients having a history of it. Patients typically experience progressive dyspnea or labored breathing, frequent coughing, and recurrent pulmonary infections. Many eventually succumb to respiratory failure, characterized by...

