Related Experiment Videos
Metamemorial knowledge of good and poor readers: a developmental perspective
The Journal of Genetic Psychology
|December 1, 1987
Summary
Poor readers do not lag behind good readers in their understanding of memory strategies. This study found that reading-disabled children possess knowledge about memory variables comparable to their peers.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Developmental Psychology
- Educational Psychology
Background:
- Reading disabilities are sometimes associated with passivity in learning and a lack of strategy use.
- This passivity has been hypothesized to stem from a developmental lag in metamemory awareness, similar to younger children.
- Metamemory, or awareness of one's own memory, is crucial for cognitive efficiency.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether children with reading disabilities exhibit a developmental lag in metamemory awareness compared to good readers.
- To assess children's knowledge of variables influencing memory performance.
Main Methods:
- Interviews were conducted with good and poor readers across second, third, and fifth grades.
- Children were questioned about their memory abilities.
- Picture-based tasks assessed knowledge of memory variables (number, time, category, strategy) and their combinations.
Main Results:
- The findings did not support the developmental lag hypothesis.
- Poor readers demonstrated knowledge of memory variables comparable to good readers within the same grade level.
- No significant difference was found in metamemory awareness between good and poor readers.
Conclusions:
- Children with reading disabilities do not appear to lag behind their peers in metamemory awareness.
- The hypothesis that reading problems are linked to a developmental deficit in understanding memory strategies is not supported by this research.
- Reading-disabled children's knowledge of memory variables is commensurate with that of average readers.