Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift01:09

Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift

60.2K
In a population that is not at Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, the frequency of alleles changes over time. Therefore, any deviations from the five conditions of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium can alter the genetic variation of a given population. Conditions that change the genetic variability of a population include mutations, natural selection, non-random mating, gene flow, and genetic drift (small population size).
60.2K
Gene Flow02:39

Gene Flow

36.3K
Gene flow is the transfer of genes among populations, resulting from either the dispersal of gametes or from the migration of individuals.
36.3K
Genome Size and the Evolution of New Genes03:21

Genome Size and the Evolution of New Genes

8.5K
While every living organism has a genome of some kind (be it RNA, or DNA), there is considerable variation in the sizes of these blueprints. One major factor that impacts genome size is whether the organism is prokaryotic or eukaryotic. In prokaryotes, the genome contains little to no non-coding sequence, such that genes are tightly clustered in groups or operons sequentially along the chromosome. Conversely, the genes in eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of non-coding sequence.
8.5K
Genome Size and the Evolution of New Genes03:21

Genome Size and the Evolution of New Genes

2.8K
2.8K
Gene Conversion02:08

Gene Conversion

10.1K
Other than maintaining genome stability via DNA repair, homologous recombination plays an important role in diversifying the genome. In fact, the recombination of sequences forms the molecular basis of genomic evolution. Random and non-random permutations of genomic sequences create a library of new amalgamated sequences. These newly formed genomes can determine the fitness and survival of cells. In bacteria, homologous and non-homologous types of recombination lead to the evolution of new...
10.1K
Gene Conversion02:08

Gene Conversion

2.6K
2.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

How competition can drive allochronic divergence: A case study in the Marine Midge, Clunio marinus.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same author

Optimizing play for learning risky behaviour.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same author

Phenotypic polymorphism via mate copying.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Coexistence rules for small, antagonistically interacting microbial communities.

PLoS computational biology·2025
Same author

The Evolution of Dependence and Cohesion in Incipient Endosymbioses.

The American naturalist·2025
Same author

Collective cooperative intelligence.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 25, 2025

An Ecdysone Receptor-based Singular Gene Switch for Deliberate Expression of Transgene with Robustness, Reversibility, and Negligible Leakiness
06:21

An Ecdysone Receptor-based Singular Gene Switch for Deliberate Expression of Transgene with Robustness, Reversibility, and Negligible Leakiness

Published on: May 7, 2018

6.6K

A common gene drive language eases regulatory process and eco-evolutionary extensions.

Prateek Verma1, R Guy Reeves2, Chaitanya S Gokhale3

  • 1Research Group for Theoretical Models of Eco-evolutionary Dynamics, Department of Evolutionary Theory, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Plön, Germany. verma@evolbio.mpg.de.

BMC Ecology and Evolution
|August 10, 2021
PubMed
Summary

We developed a simplified language to compare synthetic gene drives, aiding regulators and researchers. This framework allows for objective risk assessment and public engagement with gene drive technologies.

Keywords:
Gene driveRegulatory adviceReplacement drivesSingle constructSpatial effects

More Related Videos

Small-Cage Laboratory Trials of Genetically-Engineered Anopheline Mosquitoes
07:45

Small-Cage Laboratory Trials of Genetically-Engineered Anopheline Mosquitoes

Published on: May 1, 2021

2.9K
Preventing the Spread of Malaria and Dengue Fever Using Genetically Modified Mosquitoes
17:50

Preventing the Spread of Malaria and Dengue Fever Using Genetically Modified Mosquitoes

Published on: July 4, 2007

12.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 25, 2025

An Ecdysone Receptor-based Singular Gene Switch for Deliberate Expression of Transgene with Robustness, Reversibility, and Negligible Leakiness
06:21

An Ecdysone Receptor-based Singular Gene Switch for Deliberate Expression of Transgene with Robustness, Reversibility, and Negligible Leakiness

Published on: May 7, 2018

6.6K
Small-Cage Laboratory Trials of Genetically-Engineered Anopheline Mosquitoes
07:45

Small-Cage Laboratory Trials of Genetically-Engineered Anopheline Mosquitoes

Published on: May 1, 2021

2.9K
Preventing the Spread of Malaria and Dengue Fever Using Genetically Modified Mosquitoes
17:50

Preventing the Spread of Malaria and Dengue Fever Using Genetically Modified Mosquitoes

Published on: July 4, 2007

12.7K

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Population Dynamics
  • Synthetic Biology

Background:

  • Synthetic gene drive technologies are designed to spread engineered genetic elements through wild populations, even with fitness costs.
  • The diversity of drive mechanisms and selective pressures complicates the prediction and comparison of their properties, hindering regulatory oversight.
  • A unified vocabulary and framework are needed to effectively evaluate and regulate gene drive systems.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a simplified, parameter-based language for describing synthetic gene drives.
  • To enable the comparison of diverse gene drive mechanisms on an equal footing.
  • To provide a tool for regulators, policymakers, and researchers to assess gene drive properties and risks.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing classical population dynamics modeling.
  • Developing a generalized framework to condense and evaluate different replacement drive mechanisms.
  • Analytical extension of invasion dynamics and spatial resilience studies.

Main Results:

  • Different drive construct mechanisms can be condensed and evaluated using a common language.
  • The framework facilitates comparison of various model properties, aiding regulatory assessment.
  • The study provides analytical insights into invasion dynamics and spatial resilience of gene drives.

Conclusions:

  • The developed tool offers an intuitive and objective method for risk assessment of gene drives.
  • It supports educational exploration of drive dynamics and hypothetical scenarios.
  • The results enhance public engagement and inform policy decisions regarding gene drive technologies.