Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 25, 2025

Isokinetic Robotic Device to Improve Test-Retest and Inter-Rater Reliability for Stretch Reflex Measurements in Stroke Patients with Spasticity
Published on: June 12, 2019
Inter-observer reliability using the General Movement Assessment is influenced by rater experience.
C Peyton1, A Pascal2, L Boswell3
1Department of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Science, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, 645 N. Michigan Ave, Chicago, IL 60611, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
The General Movement Assessment (GMA) shows fair to moderate reliability for assessing fidgety movements (FMs) in infants at high risk for cerebral palsy (CP). Reliability improves with rater experience.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Developmental Pediatrics
- Movement Science
Background:
- Cerebral palsy (CP) is a common motor disability in children.
- Early detection of CP is crucial for timely intervention.
- The General Movement Assessment (GMA) is a validated tool for assessing neurological development in infants.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the inter-observer reliability of the Prechtl General Movement Assessment (GMA).
- To assess the impact of rater experience on GMA reliability.
- To examine the reliability of classifying fidgety movements (FMs) in high-risk infants.
Main Methods:
- 150 infants at high risk for CP were video-assessed at 10-15 weeks corrected age.
- Three Prechtl GMA-certified observers with varying experience rated the videos.
- Inter-observer agreement was analyzed using Gwet's AC1 statistic for FM temporal organization.
Main Results:
- Fair to moderate agreement was found for subcategories of normal FMs (AC1 = 0.32-0.57).
- Moderate to near-perfect agreement was achieved when normal FM categories were combined (AC1 = 0.60-0.95).
- Higher reliability was observed among more experienced raters (AC1 = 0.57-0.98) compared to less experienced ones (AC1 = 0.32-0.61).
Conclusions:
- The GMA demonstrates high reliability among experienced raters for categorizing normal FMs.
- Caution is advised when using the GMA to differentiate between continuous and intermittent FMs.
- The GMA is a reliable tool for assessing infants at high risk for CP, especially with experienced observers.
Related Concept Videos
Naturalistic Observations
Actor-Observer Effect

