Multiple sclerosis incidence rate in southern Iran: a Bayesian epidemiological study

Naeimehossadat Asmarian1, Zahra Sharafi2,3, Amin Mousavi4

  • 1Anesthesiology and Critical Care Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

BMC Neurology
|August 11, 2021
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

This study found that higher vitamin D intake and lower smoking rates are linked to reduced Multiple Sclerosis (MS) incidence in Fars province. These factors significantly influence MS risk, offering insights for public health strategies.

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Public Health
  • Neurology

Background:

  • Multiple Sclerosis (MS) presents a significant public health challenge due to unknown mechanisms and impacts on young adults.
  • Prevalence in Iran ranges from 5.30 to 74.28 per 100,000 people.
  • High MS prevalence in Fars province necessitates spatial analysis for improved health resource allocation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the spatial pattern of MS incidence rate in Fars province.
  • To model spatial dependence and risk factors using a Bayesian Poisson model.
  • To inform health resource allocation decisions for MS management.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized data from 5468 MS patients diagnosed via McDonald's criteria (1991-2016).
  • Employed a Bayesian spatio-temporal hierarchical model to analyze MS incidence.
  • Investigated associations with vitamin D intake, smoking, BMI, and alcohol consumption across 29 counties.

Main Results:

  • County-level incidence rates varied from 0.22 to 11.31 per 100,000 population.
  • Shiraz county showed the highest relative risk (1.80), Zarindasht the lowest (0.11).
  • A 1% increase in vitamin D intake correlated with a 2% MS risk decrease; a 1% smoking increase correlated with a 16% MS risk increase.

Conclusions:

  • Bayesian spatio-temporal analysis indicated a less steep MS incidence trend in southern/southeastern Fars.
  • Lower MS incidence was associated with higher vitamin D supplementation and lower smoking prevalence.
  • Smoking and low vitamin D are identified as key risk factors potentially associated with high MS incidence.

Related Concept Videos

Prevalence and Incidence01:08

Prevalence and Incidence

In statistical epidemiology and health sciences, two essential metrics—prevalence and incidence—are fundamental for understanding disease dynamics within a population. These measures enable public health officials, epidemiologists, and researchers to assess the burden of diseases, allocate resources effectively, and design impactful public health policies and interventions.
Prevalence indicates the proportion of individuals in a population who have a specific disease or health...
1.0K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
844
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data01:25

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods:
635
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
321
Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
1.1K
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
304